{"schemaVersion":1,"methodology":"Exploratory batch, not a controlled speed benchmark. The original Flash batch uses three prompts per idea; the premium pilot uses prompt 1 on four ideas. Variants share project backend data, not a fresh isolated database per run. Elapsed time includes browser handoffs, interruptions and recovery. Screenshots do not verify functionality. Models are recorded run labels.","ideas":[{"id":"paper-circle","title":"Paper Circle","category":"research","brief":"A shared reading room for research PDFs: page-linked discussion, personal notes, and AI questions grounded in each paper."},{"id":"ceramics-workshop","title":"Clay Club","category":"small-business","brief":"A ceramicist's class calendar with class detail pages, capacity-aware booking requests, and a simple owner view."},{"id":"client-proofing","title":"Proof Room","category":"creative-tools","brief":"A photographer's client proofing workspace with image favorites, shot-specific comments, and a final selection summary."},{"id":"volunteer-shifts","title":"Good Shift","category":"community","brief":"A volunteer event organizer with available shifts, signups, capacity tracking, and coordinator summaries."},{"id":"field-guide","title":"Pocket Field Guide","category":"education","brief":"An illustrated local nature guide with searchable species, a personal sightings journal, and collection progress."},{"id":"proposal-builder","title":"Scope Studio","category":"business-tools","brief":"A freelancer's proposal builder with reusable services, editable scope, price calculations, and a shareable read-only proposal."},{"id":"recipe-lab","title":"Recipe Lab","category":"personal","brief":"A personal recipe library with serving scaling, ingredient-based search, and weekly meal collections."},{"id":"film-society","title":"Frame Club","category":"community","brief":"A film club workspace for suggesting films, voting on the next screening, and posting discussion questions."},{"id":"museum-trail","title":"Small Museum","category":"culture","brief":"An online micro-museum with themed exhibits, narrated object stories, and visitor-curated collections."},{"id":"repair-cafe","title":"Repair Desk","category":"community","brief":"A repair cafe intake board that collects item problems, assigns repair slots, and tracks volunteer progress."},{"id":"learning-roadmap","title":"Skill Trail","category":"education","brief":"A self-directed learning planner with milestones, resource notes, and a visible progress map."},{"id":"pop-up-menu","title":"Tonight's Table","category":"small-business","brief":"A pop-up dinner site with an editorial menu, service dates, and reservation requests."},{"id":"reading-notes","title":"Margin Notes","category":"personal","brief":"A reading journal organized around books, short reflections, tags, and a visual reading timeline."},{"id":"team-decisions","title":"Decision Log","category":"business-tools","brief":"A small team's decision journal with proposals, alternatives, comments, and recorded outcomes."},{"id":"garden-planner","title":"Plot & Season","category":"personal","brief":"A raised-bed garden planner with a drag-and-drop plot, task calendar, and harvest journal."},{"id":"design-brief","title":"Brief Builder","category":"creative-tools","brief":"A structured client brief tool that turns questionnaire answers into an editable creative brief."},{"id":"packing-board","title":"Pack Together","category":"travel","brief":"A group trip packing board with shared items, ownership, and personal checklists."},{"id":"market-vendors","title":"Market Day","category":"small-business","brief":"A local maker market directory with a stall map, vendor profiles, and a saved shopping route."},{"id":"audio-feedback","title":"Listening Room","category":"creative-tools","brief":"A musician's private demo feedback room with timestamped comments and version comparisons."},{"id":"neighborhood-lending","title":"Borrow Shelf","category":"community","brief":"A neighbors' item lending library with availability, requests, and owner approval."},{"id":"data-story","title":"Chart Story","category":"education","brief":"A guided data-story builder that imports a small CSV and pairs charts with an authored explanation."},{"id":"oral-history","title":"Story Archive","category":"culture","brief":"A family-history archive of consented audio clips, transcripts, and related objects."},{"id":"meeting-actions","title":"Action Minutes","category":"business-tools","brief":"A meeting transcript workspace that drafts action items and lets people correct and assign them."},{"id":"care-organizer","title":"Care Calendar","category":"personal","brief":"A household coordination calendar for non-medical errands, meals, and visits."}],"builds":[{"id":"paper-circle-p1-flash36","ideaId":"paper-circle","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Paper Circle\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A shared reading room for research PDFs: page-linked discussion, personal notes, and AI questions grounded in each paper.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Open a seeded PDF, add a page-linked comment, ask a question, and follow the answer's citation to the supporting page.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Flagship; verify document extraction, grounding, permissions, and AI quotas before committing to the full scope.\n\nCreative direction: A scholarly journal reading room. Use warm ivory, near-black serif article titles, restrained oxblood annotations, and generous reading margins. Make the PDF page the dominant central surface, with a narrow numbered annotation rail and a compact AI drawer. The entry screen should look like a journal contents page, not a marketing hero. On mobile, switch cleanly between document, discussion, and questions.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":391,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/paper-circle-p1-flash36-FQ8ICaLr8v8GQ-vtQdHL4XBu8qA.jpg","score":4.7,"visualReview":{"composition":2,"readability":3,"consistency":2,"evidence":"Research titles and summaries are readable, but navigation appears as unstyled native buttons, adjacent labels run together and metadata stretches across the full viewport. Sparse grouping weakens the intended journal hierarchy. Dependency loading, citations and reading interactions are unverified.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"paper-circle-p1-flash38","ideaId":"paper-circle","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Paper Circle\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A shared reading room for research PDFs: page-linked discussion, personal notes, and AI questions grounded in each paper.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Open a seeded PDF, add a page-linked comment, ask a question, and follow the answer's citation to the supporting page.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Flagship; verify document extraction, grounding, permissions, and AI quotas before committing to the full scope.\n\nCreative direction: A scholarly journal reading room. Use warm ivory, near-black serif article titles, restrained oxblood annotations, and generous reading margins. Make the PDF page the dominant central surface, with a narrow numbered annotation rail and a compact AI drawer. The entry screen should look like a journal contents page, not a marketing hero. On mobile, switch cleanly between document, discussion, and questions.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":87128,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/paper-circle-p1-flash38-RmXr_0x1e33VRNcysT1j806i6Ts.jpg","score":8,"visualReview":{"composition":4,"readability":4,"consistency":4,"evidence":"Scholarly typography and warm white surfaces create a coherent research-directory identity, with clear red reading-room actions. Small metadata and numerous grounding badges add clutter. Grounding claims and reading-room behavior are not verified.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"paper-circle-p2-flash36","ideaId":"paper-circle","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Paper Circle\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A shared reading room for research PDFs: page-linked discussion, personal notes, and AI questions grounded in each paper.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Open a seeded PDF, add a page-linked comment, ask a question, and follow the answer's citation to the supporting page.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Flagship; verify document extraction, grounding, permissions, and AI quotas before committing to the full scope.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary research lab desk. Use cool white, graphite, and one electric-blue accent; sans-serif headings paired with monospace page references. Organize the reading workspace as a resizable document-and-conversation split, with compact paper tabs and visible citation chips. Give each paper a clean metadata header and make unread discussion counts useful rather than decorative.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":82,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/paper-circle-p2-flash36-UtMpIygXe6e3rWUEXSTn3XDkrXI.jpg","score":null},{"id":"paper-circle-p2-flash38","ideaId":"paper-circle","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Paper Circle\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A shared reading room for research PDFs: page-linked discussion, personal notes, and AI questions grounded in each paper.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Open a seeded PDF, add a page-linked comment, ask a question, and follow the answer's citation to the supporting page.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Flagship; verify document extraction, grounding, permissions, and AI quotas before committing to the full scope.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary research lab desk. Use cool white, graphite, and one electric-blue accent; sans-serif headings paired with monospace page references. Organize the reading workspace as a resizable document-and-conversation split, with compact paper tabs and visible citation chips. Give each paper a clean metadata header and make unread discussion counts useful rather than decorative.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":286,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/paper-circle-p2-flash38-l_BvXpauUM3VbVhua0JHOmZSlro.jpg","score":null},{"id":"paper-circle-p3-flash36","ideaId":"paper-circle","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Paper Circle\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A shared reading room for research PDFs: page-linked discussion, personal notes, and AI questions grounded in each paper.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Open a seeded PDF, add a page-linked comment, ask a question, and follow the answer's citation to the supporting page.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Flagship; verify document extraction, grounding, permissions, and AI quotas before committing to the full scope.\n\nCreative direction: A seminar-room pinboard interpreted with restraint. Use pale sand, deep forest green, and crisp square-edged note panels. Start with a curated shelf of paper abstracts, then a document view with a horizontal page navigator and stacked discussion threads. Differentiate personal notes, shared discussion, and AI answers through labels and subtle border treatments rather than bright chat bubbles.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":101,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/paper-circle-p3-flash36-ukO7zKbRHUCSbtDRfTtIAkkebug.jpg","score":null},{"id":"paper-circle-p3-flash38","ideaId":"paper-circle","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Paper Circle\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A shared reading room for research PDFs: page-linked discussion, personal notes, and AI questions grounded in each paper.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Open a seeded PDF, add a page-linked comment, ask a question, and follow the answer's citation to the supporting page.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Flagship; verify document extraction, grounding, permissions, and AI quotas before committing to the full scope.\n\nCreative direction: A seminar-room pinboard interpreted with restraint. Use pale sand, deep forest green, and crisp square-edged note panels. Start with a curated shelf of paper abstracts, then a document view with a horizontal page navigator and stacked discussion threads. Differentiate personal notes, shared discussion, and AI answers through labels and subtle border treatments rather than bright chat bubbles.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":224,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/paper-circle-p3-flash38-grO61haP2lSc7BmkN31tl9kWIp8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"ceramics-workshop-p1-flash36","ideaId":"ceramics-workshop","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Clay Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A ceramicist's class calendar with class detail pages, capacity-aware booking requests, and a simple owner view.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit a booking request, see it in the owner view, and prevent requests beyond the configured capacity.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Requests only; no real payments or calendar integrations in v1.\n\nCreative direction: An independent ceramicist's editorial studio. Use terracotta, warm chalk, expressive serif headings, and large close-up clay photographs with credible attribution. Put the next class and remaining capacity immediately above the fold, with a narrow calendar strip and asymmetrical class cards. Keep the owner view quiet and practical; avoid a generic SaaS hero.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":163,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/ceramics-workshop-p1-flash36-Imj_FiBV9V_qLEShTgJ3V4hAWaw.jpg","score":8,"visualReview":{"composition":3,"readability":4,"consistency":5,"evidence":"Expressive serif type, muted clay/green colors and a pottery photograph form a cohesive craft identity. The headline occupies most of the viewport and workshop details or booking actions are not visible. This evaluates only the opening composition, not the calendar or booking flow.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"ceramics-workshop-p1-flash38","ideaId":"ceramics-workshop","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Clay Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A ceramicist's class calendar with class detail pages, capacity-aware booking requests, and a simple owner view.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit a booking request, see it in the owner view, and prevent requests beyond the configured capacity.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Requests only; no real payments or calendar integrations in v1.\n\nCreative direction: An independent ceramicist's editorial studio. Use terracotta, warm chalk, expressive serif headings, and large close-up clay photographs with credible attribution. Put the next class and remaining capacity immediately above the fold, with a narrow calendar strip and asymmetrical class cards. Keep the owner view quiet and practical; avoid a generic SaaS hero.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":1059,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/ceramics-workshop-p1-flash38-Fpt4r3Hc9MLFfewqnzflV1XZfKw.jpg","score":9.3,"visualReview":{"composition":5,"readability":4,"consistency":5,"evidence":"Balanced editorial headline/photo composition and a clearly grouped next-workshop card with a prominent request action. Warm clay colors and typography are cohesive. Condensed secondary metadata is small; calendar and booking interactions are not verified.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"ceramics-workshop-p2-flash36","ideaId":"ceramics-workshop","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Clay Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A ceramicist's class calendar with class detail pages, capacity-aware booking requests, and a simple owner view.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit a booking request, see it in the owner view, and prevent requests beyond the configured capacity.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Requests only; no real payments or calendar integrations in v1.\n\nCreative direction: A precise Japanese-inspired workshop timetable. Use off-white, charcoal, muted indigo, generous spacing, and fine ruled lines. Lead with a weekly schedule whose class names, skill levels, dates, and request actions are easy to scan. Place intimate studio imagery in small purposeful crops and use rectangular controls with excellent focus states.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":153,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/ceramics-workshop-p2-flash36-VK0VnRMysy4jc8V-O0ee4-qXHjQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"ceramics-workshop-p2-flash38","ideaId":"ceramics-workshop","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Clay Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A ceramicist's class calendar with class detail pages, capacity-aware booking requests, and a simple owner view.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit a booking request, see it in the owner view, and prevent requests beyond the configured capacity.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Requests only; no real payments or calendar integrations in v1.\n\nCreative direction: A precise Japanese-inspired workshop timetable. Use off-white, charcoal, muted indigo, generous spacing, and fine ruled lines. Lead with a weekly schedule whose class names, skill levels, dates, and request actions are easy to scan. Place intimate studio imagery in small purposeful crops and use rectangular controls with excellent focus states.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":87058,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/ceramics-workshop-p2-flash38-GIlT8B96SZvlopY56AcyE6fxxsg.jpg","score":null},{"id":"ceramics-workshop-p3-flash36","ideaId":"ceramics-workshop","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Clay Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A ceramicist's class calendar with class detail pages, capacity-aware booking requests, and a simple owner view.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit a booking request, see it in the owner view, and prevent requests beyond the configured capacity.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Requests only; no real payments or calendar integrations in v1.\n\nCreative direction: A neighborhood clay club poster. Use cobalt lettering, pale butter backgrounds, and a restrained rust accent. Build a bold typographic date board with oversized day numerals and clearly separated class details below each date. Give booking a short step-by-step panel and present request status with words, not color alone.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":96,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/ceramics-workshop-p3-flash36-jUWfaTizSMJuGhMvqL3soI-uO0g.jpg","score":null},{"id":"ceramics-workshop-p3-flash38","ideaId":"ceramics-workshop","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Clay Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A ceramicist's class calendar with class detail pages, capacity-aware booking requests, and a simple owner view.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit a booking request, see it in the owner view, and prevent requests beyond the configured capacity.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Requests only; no real payments or calendar integrations in v1.\n\nCreative direction: A neighborhood clay club poster. Use cobalt lettering, pale butter backgrounds, and a restrained rust accent. Build a bold typographic date board with oversized day numerals and clearly separated class details below each date. Give booking a short step-by-step panel and present request status with words, not color alone.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":293,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/ceramics-workshop-p3-flash38-VjLLVd4zlmu5Pe-feLwNYRUnVg8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"client-proofing-p1-flash36","ideaId":"client-proofing","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Proof Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A photographer's client proofing workspace with image favorites, shot-specific comments, and a final selection summary.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select photos and add feedback; reload and verify the selection summary persists for that client.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed sample photos and synthetic clients; isolate client workspaces.\n\nCreative direction: A premium photography contact sheet. Use a charcoal workspace, neutral white labels, thin rules, and minimal controls around generous image grids. Selecting an image should open a distraction-free lightbox with a slim feedback rail and visible favorite state. Keep the final selection count anchored and the summary suitable for a real client handoff.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":379,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/client-proofing-p1-flash36-HpGLABC2IzIXPgeO01WDX5sKVlo.jpg","score":3.3,"visualReview":{"composition":2,"readability":2,"consistency":1,"evidence":"The captured proofing interface has touching header labels, mostly native-looking controls, a disproportionate save button and an oversized photo below the toolbar. Main text is readable but alignment and component scale are inconsistent. The screenshot cannot distinguish a dependency-loading failure from generated styling defects.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"client-proofing-p1-flash38","ideaId":"client-proofing","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Proof Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A photographer's client proofing workspace with image favorites, shot-specific comments, and a final selection summary.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select photos and add feedback; reload and verify the selection summary persists for that client.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed sample photos and synthetic clients; isolate client workspaces.\n\nCreative direction: A premium photography contact sheet. Use a charcoal workspace, neutral white labels, thin rules, and minimal controls around generous image grids. Selecting an image should open a distraction-free lightbox with a slim feedback rail and visible favorite state. Keep the final selection count anchored and the summary suitable for a real client handoff.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":87150,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/client-proofing-p1-flash38-pe0EIk9tMeIeWrN_bfIYtIRRCSw.jpg","score":7.3,"visualReview":{"composition":4,"readability":3,"consistency":4,"evidence":"The dark proofing grid uses yellow selection outlines consistently, with clear filters and a persistent handoff action. Small metadata overlaps in the quota card and mixed photo heights leave a large empty card region. Selection persistence and handoff behavior are untested.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"client-proofing-p2-flash36","ideaId":"client-proofing","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Proof Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A photographer's client proofing workspace with image favorites, shot-specific comments, and a final selection summary.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select photos and add feedback; reload and verify the selection summary persists for that client.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed sample photos and synthetic clients; isolate client workspaces.\n\nCreative direction: An art director's light table. Use a luminous white canvas, black typography, measured gutters, and a sparse red annotation accent. Place the shoot title and selection count in a compact masthead, with images arranged by consistent thumbnail boundaries rather than decorative frames. Let feedback appear alongside the image without obscuring it.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":107,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/client-proofing-p2-flash36-cxD85owJA8Z_btCogU6tioyspxw.jpg","score":null},{"id":"client-proofing-p2-flash38","ideaId":"client-proofing","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Proof Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A photographer's client proofing workspace with image favorites, shot-specific comments, and a final selection summary.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select photos and add feedback; reload and verify the selection summary persists for that client.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed sample photos and synthetic clients; isolate client workspaces.\n\nCreative direction: An art director's light table. Use a luminous white canvas, black typography, measured gutters, and a sparse red annotation accent. Place the shoot title and selection count in a compact masthead, with images arranged by consistent thumbnail boundaries rather than decorative frames. Let feedback appear alongside the image without obscuring it.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":245,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/client-proofing-p2-flash38-W5qbDWk7wLdEwlMg72hrJMcCc4I.jpg","score":null},{"id":"client-proofing-p3-flash36","ideaId":"client-proofing","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Proof Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A photographer's client proofing workspace with image favorites, shot-specific comments, and a final selection summary.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select photos and add feedback; reload and verify the selection summary persists for that client.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed sample photos and synthetic clients; isolate client workspaces.\n\nCreative direction: An editorial proof book. Use warm gray paper, navy labels, serif shoot titles, and numbered frames reminiscent of printed proofs. Organize the collection into clearly labeled sections with a persistent shortlist tray. The single-image view should pair a large photograph with an elegantly typeset comment column and a straightforward selection action.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":118,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/client-proofing-p3-flash36-KXF4grcFvnv766eWCAF-dYewYoo.jpg","score":null},{"id":"client-proofing-p3-flash38","ideaId":"client-proofing","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Proof Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A photographer's client proofing workspace with image favorites, shot-specific comments, and a final selection summary.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select photos and add feedback; reload and verify the selection summary persists for that client.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed sample photos and synthetic clients; isolate client workspaces.\n\nCreative direction: An editorial proof book. Use warm gray paper, navy labels, serif shoot titles, and numbered frames reminiscent of printed proofs. Organize the collection into clearly labeled sections with a persistent shortlist tray. The single-image view should pair a large photograph with an elegantly typeset comment column and a straightforward selection action.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":190,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/client-proofing-p3-flash38-BtwsHSJnGkGn9GP4j_o-Zig4xWs.jpg","score":null},{"id":"volunteer-shifts-p1-flash36","ideaId":"volunteer-shifts","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Good Shift\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A volunteer event organizer with available shifts, signups, capacity tracking, and coordinator summaries.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Reserve a shift, cancel it, and verify capacity and coordinator totals update correctly.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic people only; prevent concurrent signups exceeding capacity.\n\nCreative direction: A bright civic noticeboard. Use cream, royal blue, and a restrained orange accent with large legible time labels. Lead with the day's shift board and open places; place role descriptions in expandable cards. Make reserving or cancelling unmistakable and give the coordinator a compact totals strip above a functional signup table.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":371,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/volunteer-shifts-p1-flash36-7w6ysxVzz2vAdAbgOKF8-milYas.jpg","score":null},{"id":"volunteer-shifts-p1-flash38","ideaId":"volunteer-shifts","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Good Shift\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A volunteer event organizer with available shifts, signups, capacity tracking, and coordinator summaries.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Reserve a shift, cancel it, and verify capacity and coordinator totals update correctly.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic people only; prevent concurrent signups exceeding capacity.\n\nCreative direction: A bright civic noticeboard. Use cream, royal blue, and a restrained orange accent with large legible time labels. Lead with the day's shift board and open places; place role descriptions in expandable cards. Make reserving or cancelling unmistakable and give the coordinator a compact totals strip above a functional signup table.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":87324,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/volunteer-shifts-p1-flash38-ecqpxDmo_AhfnBz7gMfnKYp8l7c.jpg","score":null},{"id":"volunteer-shifts-p2-flash36","ideaId":"volunteer-shifts","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Good Shift\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A volunteer event organizer with available shifts, signups, capacity tracking, and coordinator summaries.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Reserve a shift, cancel it, and verify capacity and coordinator totals update correctly.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic people only; prevent concurrent signups exceeding capacity.\n\nCreative direction: A calm community operations desk. Use pale mint, deep navy, thin dividers, and highly readable sans-serif typography. Organize shifts in a chronological agenda with role filters and a clearly separated My Shifts panel. Show capacity as both text and a modest meter, and make cancellation feedback immediate and accessible.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":76,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/volunteer-shifts-p2-flash36-bAafoqh3gS1bppIk36ZR7OtZQU4.jpg","score":null},{"id":"volunteer-shifts-p2-flash38","ideaId":"volunteer-shifts","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Good Shift\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A volunteer event organizer with available shifts, signups, capacity tracking, and coordinator summaries.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Reserve a shift, cancel it, and verify capacity and coordinator totals update correctly.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic people only; prevent concurrent signups exceeding capacity.\n\nCreative direction: A calm community operations desk. Use pale mint, deep navy, thin dividers, and highly readable sans-serif typography. Organize shifts in a chronological agenda with role filters and a clearly separated My Shifts panel. Show capacity as both text and a modest meter, and make cancellation feedback immediate and accessible.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":189,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/volunteer-shifts-p2-flash38-S0ntZ5QcFkMq-wXrIOfin2LRDo0.jpg","score":null},{"id":"volunteer-shifts-p3-flash36","ideaId":"volunteer-shifts","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Good Shift\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A volunteer event organizer with available shifts, signups, capacity tracking, and coordinator summaries.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Reserve a shift, cancel it, and verify capacity and coordinator totals update correctly.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic people only; prevent concurrent signups exceeding capacity.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary neighborhood event program. Use white, charcoal, and vivid coral sparingly, with bold poster-like date headings. Structure the page as an event overview followed by alternating time blocks and role rows. Put the signup action beside the actual remaining places and keep coordinator controls clearly identified as a separate role.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":75,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/volunteer-shifts-p3-flash36-RDxVEZNgMZaqA4tf2O5k27-czUk.jpg","score":null},{"id":"volunteer-shifts-p3-flash38","ideaId":"volunteer-shifts","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Good Shift\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A volunteer event organizer with available shifts, signups, capacity tracking, and coordinator summaries.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Reserve a shift, cancel it, and verify capacity and coordinator totals update correctly.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic people only; prevent concurrent signups exceeding capacity.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary neighborhood event program. Use white, charcoal, and vivid coral sparingly, with bold poster-like date headings. Structure the page as an event overview followed by alternating time blocks and role rows. Put the signup action beside the actual remaining places and keep coordinator controls clearly identified as a separate role.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":161,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/volunteer-shifts-p3-flash38-wDRewrCq2FSwo0m1XBpHMSGJHpQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"field-guide-p1-flash36","ideaId":"field-guide","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Pocket Field Guide\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An illustrated local nature guide with searchable species, a personal sightings journal, and collection progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter species, record a sighting without exact location, and find it again after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No precise location data; no edible-plant or safety advice.\n\nCreative direction: A natural-history field notebook. Use warm paper, moss-green headings, botanical spot illustrations, and small specimen-style captions. Begin with searchable species plates, then a detail page that pairs identification features with a simple Record Sighting action. Show the personal journal as dated observations without maps or precise coordinates.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":136,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/field-guide-p1-flash36-ZzRIbs2tf4k1Abh7QoSBdUYAzso.jpg","score":null},{"id":"field-guide-p1-flash38","ideaId":"field-guide","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Pocket Field Guide\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An illustrated local nature guide with searchable species, a personal sightings journal, and collection progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter species, record a sighting without exact location, and find it again after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No precise location data; no edible-plant or safety advice.\n\nCreative direction: A natural-history field notebook. Use warm paper, moss-green headings, botanical spot illustrations, and small specimen-style captions. Begin with searchable species plates, then a detail page that pairs identification features with a simple Record Sighting action. Show the personal journal as dated observations without maps or precise coordinates.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":297,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/field-guide-p1-flash38-QM0-8bXE6m3LaQ5x8_cjbm--_0g.jpg","score":null},{"id":"field-guide-p2-flash36","ideaId":"field-guide","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Pocket Field Guide\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An illustrated local nature guide with searchable species, a personal sightings journal, and collection progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter species, record a sighting without exact location, and find it again after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No precise location data; no edible-plant or safety advice.\n\nCreative direction: A modern ranger's reference kit. Use cream, slate, and a bright restrained yellow accent with crisp sans-serif labels. Organize species by useful visual filters and compact illustrated cards, with a fast detail drawer and a persistent journal tab. Use collection progress as a small informative counter, not a gamified badge wall.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":107,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/field-guide-p2-flash36-2_39l2NJRxDW3q1lD_Wr84cXXuQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"field-guide-p2-flash38","ideaId":"field-guide","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Pocket Field Guide\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An illustrated local nature guide with searchable species, a personal sightings journal, and collection progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter species, record a sighting without exact location, and find it again after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No precise location data; no edible-plant or safety advice.\n\nCreative direction: A modern ranger's reference kit. Use cream, slate, and a bright restrained yellow accent with crisp sans-serif labels. Organize species by useful visual filters and compact illustrated cards, with a fast detail drawer and a persistent journal tab. Use collection progress as a small informative counter, not a gamified badge wall.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":163,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/field-guide-p2-flash38-PwqQwz9I3sC_WvnKg1PzXmtjIPM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"field-guide-p3-flash36","ideaId":"field-guide","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Pocket Field Guide\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An illustrated local nature guide with searchable species, a personal sightings journal, and collection progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter species, record a sighting without exact location, and find it again after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No precise location data; no edible-plant or safety advice.\n\nCreative direction: A quietly immersive nature atlas. Use deep forest framing around pale content panels, large authored or licensed illustrations, and spacious serif species names. Present a browsable index beside the selected species on desktop and a simple list-to-detail flow on mobile. Journal entries should read like concise personal observations with dates and optional notes.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":121,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/field-guide-p3-flash36-L32o7Q0_Uyn8k7B239z4eSW5OoE.jpg","score":null},{"id":"field-guide-p3-flash38","ideaId":"field-guide","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Pocket Field Guide\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An illustrated local nature guide with searchable species, a personal sightings journal, and collection progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter species, record a sighting without exact location, and find it again after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No precise location data; no edible-plant or safety advice.\n\nCreative direction: A quietly immersive nature atlas. Use deep forest framing around pale content panels, large authored or licensed illustrations, and spacious serif species names. Present a browsable index beside the selected species on desktop and a simple list-to-detail flow on mobile. Journal entries should read like concise personal observations with dates and optional notes.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":265,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/field-guide-p3-flash38-hOEbtcjtNgm4WHMkvMR74Und0IA.jpg","score":null},{"id":"proposal-builder-p1-flash36","ideaId":"proposal-builder","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Scope Studio\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A freelancer's proposal builder with reusable services, editable scope, price calculations, and a shareable read-only proposal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, change quantities, and verify the saved public view displays correct totals but no editing controls.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No binding signatures or real payments; explicitly label the demo.\n\nCreative direction: An architectural practice's document studio. Use a precise grid, ivory background, ink typography, and a single lime accent. Put the editable scope beside a live proposal preview, with clearly aligned quantity, unit price, and total columns. The read-only share view should resemble a polished business document rather than an admin screen.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":195,"timingQuality":"Timing conditions unrecorded","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/proposal-builder-p1-flash36-nm-jZ0BvVu5saULUsilDD42KnD4.jpg","score":null},{"id":"proposal-builder-p1-flash38","ideaId":"proposal-builder","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Scope Studio\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A freelancer's proposal builder with reusable services, editable scope, price calculations, and a shareable read-only proposal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, change quantities, and verify the saved public view displays correct totals but no editing controls.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No binding signatures or real payments; explicitly label the demo.\n\nCreative direction: An architectural practice's document studio. Use a precise grid, ivory background, ink typography, and a single lime accent. Put the editable scope beside a live proposal preview, with clearly aligned quantity, unit price, and total columns. The read-only share view should resemble a polished business document rather than an admin screen.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":168,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/proposal-builder-p1-flash38-yi5RdTU0_RWUj7uSifPZiIJVqRg.jpg","score":null},{"id":"proposal-builder-p2-flash36","ideaId":"proposal-builder","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Scope Studio\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A freelancer's proposal builder with reusable services, editable scope, price calculations, and a shareable read-only proposal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, change quantities, and verify the saved public view displays correct totals but no editing controls.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No binding signatures or real payments; explicitly label the demo.\n\nCreative direction: A confident independent consultant's workbench. Use navy, white, muted apricot, and pragmatic sans-serif type. Lead with a proposal list, then a stepwise editor for client, services, and scope. Keep totals visible as edits happen and make the transition to a read-only customer view explicit and easy to verify.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":86,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/proposal-builder-p2-flash36-vEf5fdRC-SdXJ7ZCRKUoDbD3ooM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"proposal-builder-p2-flash38","ideaId":"proposal-builder","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Scope Studio\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A freelancer's proposal builder with reusable services, editable scope, price calculations, and a shareable read-only proposal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, change quantities, and verify the saved public view displays correct totals but no editing controls.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No binding signatures or real payments; explicitly label the demo.\n\nCreative direction: A confident independent consultant's workbench. Use navy, white, muted apricot, and pragmatic sans-serif type. Lead with a proposal list, then a stepwise editor for client, services, and scope. Keep totals visible as edits happen and make the transition to a read-only customer view explicit and easy to verify.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":357,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/proposal-builder-p2-flash38-9IXwCqpzrJj9s2gIuWnC5s1tgN8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"proposal-builder-p3-flash36","ideaId":"proposal-builder","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Scope Studio\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A freelancer's proposal builder with reusable services, editable scope, price calculations, and a shareable read-only proposal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, change quantities, and verify the saved public view displays correct totals but no editing controls.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No binding signatures or real payments; explicitly label the demo.\n\nCreative direction: A boutique studio's editorial proposal. Use warm monochrome, expressive but readable serif titles, and fine table rules. Structure the editing view around document sections with a compact service library at the side. The shared proposal should have strong hierarchy, generous margins, and a prominent demo label without looking like a landing page.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":72,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/proposal-builder-p3-flash36-8vp7OpK2yDtrMD2dwve6CC6PcRQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"proposal-builder-p3-flash38","ideaId":"proposal-builder","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Scope Studio\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A freelancer's proposal builder with reusable services, editable scope, price calculations, and a shareable read-only proposal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, change quantities, and verify the saved public view displays correct totals but no editing controls.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No binding signatures or real payments; explicitly label the demo.\n\nCreative direction: A boutique studio's editorial proposal. Use warm monochrome, expressive but readable serif titles, and fine table rules. Structure the editing view around document sections with a compact service library at the side. The shared proposal should have strong hierarchy, generous margins, and a prominent demo label without looking like a landing page.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":231,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/proposal-builder-p3-flash38-7ef5vEQZu2c_IOmAJKMNkSzAa98.jpg","score":null},{"id":"recipe-lab-p1-flash36","ideaId":"recipe-lab","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Recipe Lab\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A personal recipe library with serving scaling, ingredient-based search, and weekly meal collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Scale a recipe and save a weekly collection that survives reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No medical or dietary safety claims; use authored sample recipes.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary cookbook spread. Use warm ivory, tomato-red accents, generous food photography, and compact ingredient tables. Make recipe search and serving adjustment visible immediately, then arrange instructions beside scaled ingredients. Present the weekly collection as a simple seven-day planning strip with clearly saved state.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":103,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/recipe-lab-p1-flash36-x7QvHD8oQPUMwjxa1CEnJDESBhw.jpg","score":8.7,"visualReview":{"composition":4,"readability":4,"consistency":5,"evidence":"Search/filter controls, recipe photography, serving adjustment and numbered method are clearly grouped in a cohesive cream/red interface. Dense instructions and crowded lower tags are less comfortable to scan. Controls and recipe calculations have not been exercised.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"recipe-lab-p1-flash38","ideaId":"recipe-lab","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Recipe Lab\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A personal recipe library with serving scaling, ingredient-based search, and weekly meal collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Scale a recipe and save a weekly collection that survives reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No medical or dietary safety claims; use authored sample recipes.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary cookbook spread. Use warm ivory, tomato-red accents, generous food photography, and compact ingredient tables. Make recipe search and serving adjustment visible immediately, then arrange instructions beside scaled ingredients. Present the weekly collection as a simple seven-day planning strip with clearly saved state.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":126,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/recipe-lab-p1-flash38-MXsOL8rQ4uu3nNM182-O57TLnpA.jpg","score":6.7,"visualReview":{"composition":4,"readability":3,"consistency":3,"evidence":"Weekly planning cards, recipe navigation, serving controls and ingredients/method form a useful visible app structure. Several image regions show broken thumbnails or alt text; dense labels and truncation reduce polish. Image failure causes and saving behavior are not established by this screenshot.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"recipe-lab-p2-flash36","ideaId":"recipe-lab","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Recipe Lab\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A personal recipe library with serving scaling, ingredient-based search, and weekly meal collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Scale a recipe and save a weekly collection that survives reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No medical or dietary safety claims; use authored sample recipes.\n\nCreative direction: A practical home-kitchen index. Use white, dark olive, pale yellow, and friendly but restrained sans-serif type. Prioritize ingredient search in a useful filter bar, display recipes in a tidy image-led grid, and show the weekly plan as a compact list. Scaling controls must be near the quantities they change.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":152,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/recipe-lab-p2-flash36-mM9kWUn3m1YUY94YfAbttKhFDgw.jpg","score":null},{"id":"recipe-lab-p2-flash38","ideaId":"recipe-lab","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Recipe Lab\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A personal recipe library with serving scaling, ingredient-based search, and weekly meal collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Scale a recipe and save a weekly collection that survives reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No medical or dietary safety claims; use authored sample recipes.\n\nCreative direction: A practical home-kitchen index. Use white, dark olive, pale yellow, and friendly but restrained sans-serif type. Prioritize ingredient search in a useful filter bar, display recipes in a tidy image-led grid, and show the weekly plan as a compact list. Scaling controls must be near the quantities they change.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":177,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/recipe-lab-p2-flash38-TWND6BKTDaHJY-byALcrXX9YOk4.jpg","score":null},{"id":"recipe-lab-p3-flash36","ideaId":"recipe-lab","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Recipe Lab\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A personal recipe library with serving scaling, ingredient-based search, and weekly meal collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Scale a recipe and save a weekly collection that survives reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No medical or dietary safety claims; use authored sample recipes.\n\nCreative direction: An independent food magazine's recipe notebook. Use rich aubergine accents on pale paper, serif recipe names, and deliberately varied editorial image crops. Open with a small curated recipe selection rather than a promotional hero. The recipe view should clearly separate ingredients, serving controls, steps, and Add to Week, with a calm focused reading mode.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":127,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/recipe-lab-p3-flash36-hbERHF5QVKr2XmByap77eV1chgM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"recipe-lab-p3-flash38","ideaId":"recipe-lab","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Recipe Lab\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A personal recipe library with serving scaling, ingredient-based search, and weekly meal collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Scale a recipe and save a weekly collection that survives reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No medical or dietary safety claims; use authored sample recipes.\n\nCreative direction: An independent food magazine's recipe notebook. Use rich aubergine accents on pale paper, serif recipe names, and deliberately varied editorial image crops. Open with a small curated recipe selection rather than a promotional hero. The recipe view should clearly separate ingredients, serving controls, steps, and Add to Week, with a calm focused reading mode.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":166,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/recipe-lab-p3-flash38-XqcDkTSaHt-AswZ6ybqWLTmGDu0.jpg","score":null},{"id":"film-society-p1-flash36","ideaId":"film-society","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Frame Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A film club workspace for suggesting films, voting on the next screening, and posting discussion questions.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Suggest a film, vote once per member, and close a poll with stable results.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed or original artwork; avoid scraped streaming data.\n\nCreative direction: An independent cinema program. Use cream, black, and one saturated red accent with large typographic film tiles and original poster art. Put the active screening poll first, with distinct nomination, vote, and results states. Discussion questions should feel like a post-screening reading sheet, not a social-media feed.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":132,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/film-society-p1-flash36-xABvkutLV9h4fHOEUaox3Z9-Ri4.jpg","score":null},{"id":"film-society-p1-flash38","ideaId":"film-society","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Frame Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A film club workspace for suggesting films, voting on the next screening, and posting discussion questions.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Suggest a film, vote once per member, and close a poll with stable results.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed or original artwork; avoid scraped streaming data.\n\nCreative direction: An independent cinema program. Use cream, black, and one saturated red accent with large typographic film tiles and original poster art. Put the active screening poll first, with distinct nomination, vote, and results states. Discussion questions should feel like a post-screening reading sheet, not a social-media feed.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":152,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/film-society-p1-flash38-2ZN_h43fYIsVGM9XYNcjWtxve0Y.jpg","score":null},{"id":"film-society-p2-flash36","ideaId":"film-society","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Frame Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A film club workspace for suggesting films, voting on the next screening, and posting discussion questions.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Suggest a film, vote once per member, and close a poll with stable results.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed or original artwork; avoid scraped streaming data.\n\nCreative direction: A late-night screening room. Use deep navy, warm white, restrained amber, and spacious compact typography. Make the selected screening prominent in a horizontal feature panel, then show film suggestions in a low-chrome list with clear vote state. Closed polls should visibly lock and preserve their final counts.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":96,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/film-society-p2-flash36-EfOb2YfPbfOrfJr4NyfTQ-a4t74.jpg","score":null},{"id":"film-society-p2-flash38","ideaId":"film-society","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Frame Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A film club workspace for suggesting films, voting on the next screening, and posting discussion questions.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Suggest a film, vote once per member, and close a poll with stable results.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed or original artwork; avoid scraped streaming data.\n\nCreative direction: A late-night screening room. Use deep navy, warm white, restrained amber, and spacious compact typography. Make the selected screening prominent in a horizontal feature panel, then show film suggestions in a low-chrome list with clear vote state. Closed polls should visibly lock and preserve their final counts.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":229,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/film-society-p2-flash38-GGg2JpiCcwldzmzIiGmhLSYJJQQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"film-society-p3-flash36","ideaId":"film-society","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Frame Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A film club workspace for suggesting films, voting on the next screening, and posting discussion questions.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Suggest a film, vote once per member, and close a poll with stable results.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed or original artwork; avoid scraped streaming data.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary film festival bulletin. Use white, dark plum, lime accents, and oversized issue-style numbers for screening rounds. Lay out nominations as a structured poster grid with a narrow voting summary column. Use strong headings and explicit member identity so it is clear who is voting and why duplicate votes are prevented.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":119,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/film-society-p3-flash36-fUCMtol4yFSRbMLIrdgDZR3oNfM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"film-society-p3-flash38","ideaId":"film-society","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Frame Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A film club workspace for suggesting films, voting on the next screening, and posting discussion questions.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Suggest a film, vote once per member, and close a poll with stable results.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed or original artwork; avoid scraped streaming data.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary film festival bulletin. Use white, dark plum, lime accents, and oversized issue-style numbers for screening rounds. Lay out nominations as a structured poster grid with a narrow voting summary column. Use strong headings and explicit member identity so it is clear who is voting and why duplicate votes are prevented.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":205,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/film-society-p3-flash38-j06jGGBrNlAMkMFYUrOeDyY9baA.jpg","score":null},{"id":"museum-trail-p1-flash36","ideaId":"museum-trail","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Small Museum\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An online micro-museum with themed exhibits, narrated object stories, and visitor-curated collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Explore an exhibit and save a personal collection with attribution for each object.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Only owned or appropriately licensed media; audio optional.\n\nCreative direction: A small design museum's exhibition catalogue. Use generous white space, restrained black typography, serif object titles, and striking object crops. Lead with a thematic exhibit, followed by a clear sequence of object stories and small attribution lines. Saved objects should form a personal collection with a calm catalogue layout.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":80,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/museum-trail-p1-flash36-QhvIJXy6ioS4BGknDeqqpXBmcRE.jpg","score":null},{"id":"museum-trail-p1-flash38","ideaId":"museum-trail","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Small Museum\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An online micro-museum with themed exhibits, narrated object stories, and visitor-curated collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Explore an exhibit and save a personal collection with attribution for each object.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Only owned or appropriately licensed media; audio optional.\n\nCreative direction: A small design museum's exhibition catalogue. Use generous white space, restrained black typography, serif object titles, and striking object crops. Lead with a thematic exhibit, followed by a clear sequence of object stories and small attribution lines. Saved objects should form a personal collection with a calm catalogue layout.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":223,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/museum-trail-p1-flash38-c-EstXaMO-7awofZZA5oZXNRwh8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"museum-trail-p2-flash36","ideaId":"museum-trail","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Small Museum\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An online micro-museum with themed exhibits, narrated object stories, and visitor-curated collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Explore an exhibit and save a personal collection with attribution for each object.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Only owned or appropriately licensed media; audio optional.\n\nCreative direction: An intimate cabinet of curiosities. Use deep aubergine framing, warm parchment content, brass-colored accents, and clearly lit licensed object imagery. Organize exhibits as shelves with strong category labels, then let an object open into a focused story panel. Avoid ornamental clutter; captions and attribution must remain readable.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":171,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/museum-trail-p2-flash36-yBt0N6UQPypiqJr9E14sfzpeLxE.jpg","score":null},{"id":"museum-trail-p2-flash38","ideaId":"museum-trail","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Small Museum\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An online micro-museum with themed exhibits, narrated object stories, and visitor-curated collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Explore an exhibit and save a personal collection with attribution for each object.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Only owned or appropriately licensed media; audio optional.\n\nCreative direction: An intimate cabinet of curiosities. Use deep aubergine framing, warm parchment content, brass-colored accents, and clearly lit licensed object imagery. Organize exhibits as shelves with strong category labels, then let an object open into a focused story panel. Avoid ornamental clutter; captions and attribution must remain readable.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":329,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/museum-trail-p2-flash38-wXgsvo6E7jTebvH3_ZSP8E-mHHM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"museum-trail-p3-flash36","ideaId":"museum-trail","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Small Museum\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An online micro-museum with themed exhibits, narrated object stories, and visitor-curated collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Explore an exhibit and save a personal collection with attribution for each object.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Only owned or appropriately licensed media; audio optional.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary digital archive. Use pale gray, cobalt, a strict grid, and compact catalogue metadata. Start with an indexed exhibit list and an object browser, then pair each object with its authored narrative and source attribution. Make collecting feel like assembling a scholarly reference tray with explicit saved state.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":176,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/museum-trail-p3-flash36-nu9yQbj3GbZJiXYt8KgsiRNTK_8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"museum-trail-p3-flash38","ideaId":"museum-trail","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Small Museum\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: An online micro-museum with themed exhibits, narrated object stories, and visitor-curated collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Explore an exhibit and save a personal collection with attribution for each object.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Only owned or appropriately licensed media; audio optional.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary digital archive. Use pale gray, cobalt, a strict grid, and compact catalogue metadata. Start with an indexed exhibit list and an object browser, then pair each object with its authored narrative and source attribution. Make collecting feel like assembling a scholarly reference tray with explicit saved state.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":371,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/museum-trail-p3-flash38-zVi2_VH_DRZdJnTmtH07INfQvNY.jpg","score":null},{"id":"repair-cafe-p1-flash36","ideaId":"repair-cafe","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Repair Desk\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A repair cafe intake board that collects item problems, assigns repair slots, and tracks volunteer progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit an intake and move it through triage, scheduled, and completed in the coordinator view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No hazardous repair instructions or real personal data.\n\nCreative direction: A practical neighborhood workshop ticket board. Use warm gray, black, safety-orange accents, and utilitarian typography. Present intake cards with plain-language status labels, then a coordinator board arranged by triage, scheduled, and completed. Use compact ticket details rather than decorative machinery or hazard imagery.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":82,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/repair-cafe-p1-flash36-pfSYCnOrxocaqdI0fLejNSq6ySw.jpg","score":null},{"id":"repair-cafe-p1-flash38","ideaId":"repair-cafe","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Repair Desk\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A repair cafe intake board that collects item problems, assigns repair slots, and tracks volunteer progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit an intake and move it through triage, scheduled, and completed in the coordinator view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No hazardous repair instructions or real personal data.\n\nCreative direction: A practical neighborhood workshop ticket board. Use warm gray, black, safety-orange accents, and utilitarian typography. Present intake cards with plain-language status labels, then a coordinator board arranged by triage, scheduled, and completed. Use compact ticket details rather than decorative machinery or hazard imagery.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":212,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/repair-cafe-p1-flash38-edbB3KdvQ-tFy0jNBRCoxbMgarI.jpg","score":null},{"id":"repair-cafe-p2-flash36","ideaId":"repair-cafe","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Repair Desk\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A repair cafe intake board that collects item problems, assigns repair slots, and tracks volunteer progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit an intake and move it through triage, scheduled, and completed in the coordinator view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No hazardous repair instructions or real personal data.\n\nCreative direction: A calm repair service counter. Use white, deep teal, pale blue, and generous form spacing. Lead visitors through a short item-intake form with a useful summary, while coordinators get an agenda beside a status-filtered list. Treat status changes as clear actions with saved confirmation and an understandable history.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":126,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/repair-cafe-p2-flash36-0hB6ESZIvqa8TL8biIwTSRFC1u0.jpg","score":null},{"id":"repair-cafe-p2-flash38","ideaId":"repair-cafe","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Repair Desk\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A repair cafe intake board that collects item problems, assigns repair slots, and tracks volunteer progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit an intake and move it through triage, scheduled, and completed in the coordinator view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No hazardous repair instructions or real personal data.\n\nCreative direction: A calm repair service counter. Use white, deep teal, pale blue, and generous form spacing. Lead visitors through a short item-intake form with a useful summary, while coordinators get an agenda beside a status-filtered list. Treat status changes as clear actions with saved confirmation and an understandable history.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":299,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/repair-cafe-p2-flash38-ifWCxg_bHDgKi0kSs8Dy9beu0Co.jpg","score":null},{"id":"repair-cafe-p3-flash36","ideaId":"repair-cafe","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Repair Desk\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A repair cafe intake board that collects item problems, assigns repair slots, and tracks volunteer progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit an intake and move it through triage, scheduled, and completed in the coordinator view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No hazardous repair instructions or real personal data.\n\nCreative direction: A community repair ledger. Use off-white paper, red-pencil accents, fine ruled tables, and bold ticket numbers. Put the public intake action alongside a concise explanation of the process. The coordinator view should resemble a highly usable work ledger with searchable items, clear slot assignments, and distinct status controls.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":69,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/repair-cafe-p3-flash36-nEYUVN--9ouG2lEsFe3FhIuOZwA.jpg","score":null},{"id":"repair-cafe-p3-flash38","ideaId":"repair-cafe","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Repair Desk\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A repair cafe intake board that collects item problems, assigns repair slots, and tracks volunteer progress.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit an intake and move it through triage, scheduled, and completed in the coordinator view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No hazardous repair instructions or real personal data.\n\nCreative direction: A community repair ledger. Use off-white paper, red-pencil accents, fine ruled tables, and bold ticket numbers. Put the public intake action alongside a concise explanation of the process. The coordinator view should resemble a highly usable work ledger with searchable items, clear slot assignments, and distinct status controls.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":227,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/repair-cafe-p3-flash38-wQAL1QMIIYbAmolCcZb0em4r2bs.jpg","score":null},{"id":"learning-roadmap-p1-flash36","ideaId":"learning-roadmap","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Skill Trail\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A self-directed learning planner with milestones, resource notes, and a visible progress map.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a learning path, complete a milestone, and persist notes and progress.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use authored resources; no unverified external-course promises.\n\nCreative direction: A transit-map-inspired learning plan. Use pale ivory, navy, and three carefully chosen route colors, keeping all status meaning available in text. Make milestones a navigable path with a calm reading-and-notes panel next to the active stop. On narrow screens, convert the map to an ordered timeline rather than shrinking it illegibly.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":140,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/learning-roadmap-p1-flash36-dV9Vk7-lNXe3L-I8snq73KjE2WY.jpg","score":null},{"id":"learning-roadmap-p1-flash38","ideaId":"learning-roadmap","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Skill Trail\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A self-directed learning planner with milestones, resource notes, and a visible progress map.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a learning path, complete a milestone, and persist notes and progress.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use authored resources; no unverified external-course promises.\n\nCreative direction: A transit-map-inspired learning plan. Use pale ivory, navy, and three carefully chosen route colors, keeping all status meaning available in text. Make milestones a navigable path with a calm reading-and-notes panel next to the active stop. On narrow screens, convert the map to an ordered timeline rather than shrinking it illegibly.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":289,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/learning-roadmap-p1-flash38-WlzYG71Oi7YKfzBx6bK9oo7mEaw.jpg","score":null},{"id":"learning-roadmap-p2-flash36","ideaId":"learning-roadmap","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Skill Trail\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A self-directed learning planner with milestones, resource notes, and a visible progress map.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a learning path, complete a milestone, and persist notes and progress.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use authored resources; no unverified external-course promises.\n\nCreative direction: A focused study desk. Use warm white, charcoal, muted sage, and readable editorial typography. Organize paths in a sidebar, show milestones as a numbered checklist, and dedicate the main panel to notes and resources. Progress should be compact and meaningful, with completed milestones remaining easy to revisit.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":83,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/learning-roadmap-p2-flash36-fpSftJ86UACQe5AFVAMGxB5SkF4.jpg","score":null},{"id":"learning-roadmap-p2-flash38","ideaId":"learning-roadmap","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Skill Trail\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A self-directed learning planner with milestones, resource notes, and a visible progress map.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a learning path, complete a milestone, and persist notes and progress.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use authored resources; no unverified external-course promises.\n\nCreative direction: A focused study desk. Use warm white, charcoal, muted sage, and readable editorial typography. Organize paths in a sidebar, show milestones as a numbered checklist, and dedicate the main panel to notes and resources. Progress should be compact and meaningful, with completed milestones remaining easy to revisit.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":166,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/learning-roadmap-p2-flash38-nEdyBSQwozZggASanwX9oH6rDPU.jpg","score":null},{"id":"learning-roadmap-p3-flash36","ideaId":"learning-roadmap","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Skill Trail\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A self-directed learning planner with milestones, resource notes, and a visible progress map.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a learning path, complete a milestone, and persist notes and progress.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use authored resources; no unverified external-course promises.\n\nCreative direction: An expedition field plan. Use pale sand, deep blue, a restrained rust accent, and clear waypoint numbering. Present the learning path as successive stages with a short goal and relevant resources per stage. The notes editor should be spacious and save state explicit; avoid decorative maps or fake achievements.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":116,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/learning-roadmap-p3-flash36-T5fzDroXHkUhsy5Bs4keNCscyig.jpg","score":null},{"id":"learning-roadmap-p3-flash38","ideaId":"learning-roadmap","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Skill Trail\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A self-directed learning planner with milestones, resource notes, and a visible progress map.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a learning path, complete a milestone, and persist notes and progress.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use authored resources; no unverified external-course promises.\n\nCreative direction: An expedition field plan. Use pale sand, deep blue, a restrained rust accent, and clear waypoint numbering. Present the learning path as successive stages with a short goal and relevant resources per stage. The notes editor should be spacious and save state explicit; avoid decorative maps or fake achievements.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":300,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/learning-roadmap-p3-flash38-VaW_Eyakx4VVYpJ84ILB009Qtnc.jpg","score":null},{"id":"pop-up-menu-p1-flash36","ideaId":"pop-up-menu","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Tonight's Table\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A pop-up dinner site with an editorial menu, service dates, and reservation requests.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select a service and party size, send a request, and inspect it in the organizer view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No payment processing or claim that a request is a confirmed reservation.\n\nCreative direction: An editorial seasonal supper-club menu. Use ivory, dark olive, expressive serif headings, and carefully cropped food photographs. Put service dates beside a beautifully typeset menu, then a concise reservation-request panel. Always label the action and resulting state as a request rather than a confirmed reservation.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":138,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/pop-up-menu-p1-flash36--gafuSE1L5aviM11gNJ8gcxizgs.jpg","score":null},{"id":"pop-up-menu-p1-flash38","ideaId":"pop-up-menu","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Tonight's Table\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A pop-up dinner site with an editorial menu, service dates, and reservation requests.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select a service and party size, send a request, and inspect it in the organizer view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No payment processing or claim that a request is a confirmed reservation.\n\nCreative direction: An editorial seasonal supper-club menu. Use ivory, dark olive, expressive serif headings, and carefully cropped food photographs. Put service dates beside a beautifully typeset menu, then a concise reservation-request panel. Always label the action and resulting state as a request rather than a confirmed reservation.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":265,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/pop-up-menu-p1-flash38-oCGmivk4CcbIGq06cWXtLLpGRVY.jpg","score":null},{"id":"pop-up-menu-p2-flash36","ideaId":"pop-up-menu","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Tonight's Table\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A pop-up dinner site with an editorial menu, service dates, and reservation requests.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select a service and party size, send a request, and inspect it in the organizer view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No payment processing or claim that a request is a confirmed reservation.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary chef's counter. Use charcoal, warm white, a restrained citrus accent, and compact confident sans-serif typography. Lead with the next service and a clearly structured tasting menu, with service selection and party size in an adjacent booking card. Keep the organizer view functional and visually related but plainly separate.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":129,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/pop-up-menu-p2-flash36-ANXesv4yrbC_UJA6H8mjtnsTpVk.jpg","score":null},{"id":"pop-up-menu-p2-flash38","ideaId":"pop-up-menu","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Tonight's Table\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A pop-up dinner site with an editorial menu, service dates, and reservation requests.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select a service and party size, send a request, and inspect it in the organizer view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No payment processing or claim that a request is a confirmed reservation.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary chef's counter. Use charcoal, warm white, a restrained citrus accent, and compact confident sans-serif typography. Lead with the next service and a clearly structured tasting menu, with service selection and party size in an adjacent booking card. Keep the organizer view functional and visually related but plainly separate.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":206,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/pop-up-menu-p2-flash38-ULgmVs5mz3XoRIYKguIaAECEDBs.jpg","score":null},{"id":"pop-up-menu-p3-flash36","ideaId":"pop-up-menu","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Tonight's Table\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A pop-up dinner site with an editorial menu, service dates, and reservation requests.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select a service and party size, send a request, and inspect it in the organizer view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No payment processing or claim that a request is a confirmed reservation.\n\nCreative direction: A neighborhood pop-up printed invitation. Use pale peach, oxblood, strong date typography, and a simple single-column editorial rhythm. Treat each service as a dated invitation with menu details and a direct request action. Avoid unnecessary animation; make organizer review, request counts, and request status easy to inspect.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":233,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/pop-up-menu-p3-flash36-Ht0mhxP-TtSO4hGcJ3G0HsFGwdk.jpg","score":null},{"id":"pop-up-menu-p3-flash38","ideaId":"pop-up-menu","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Tonight's Table\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A pop-up dinner site with an editorial menu, service dates, and reservation requests.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select a service and party size, send a request, and inspect it in the organizer view.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No payment processing or claim that a request is a confirmed reservation.\n\nCreative direction: A neighborhood pop-up printed invitation. Use pale peach, oxblood, strong date typography, and a simple single-column editorial rhythm. Treat each service as a dated invitation with menu details and a direct request action. Avoid unnecessary animation; make organizer review, request counts, and request status easy to inspect.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":249,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/pop-up-menu-p3-flash38-uyd_uf4aIg6AkBm2oSXu6fFzZaQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"reading-notes-p1-flash36","ideaId":"reading-notes","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Margin Notes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A reading journal organized around books, short reflections, tags, and a visual reading timeline.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Add a book and reflection, filter by tag, and verify the timeline persists.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Do not reproduce copyrighted book passages; synthetic notes only.\n\nCreative direction: A warm library catalogue. Use ivory, near-black, muted ochre, serif book titles, and compact catalogue labels. Lead with a searchable shelf and tag filters, then a focused reflection editor. The reading timeline should read like a personal journal, with dates and short original reflections rather than decorative book quotations.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":109,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/reading-notes-p1-flash36-iH1m_u-ESuPrMV2tM3PMMT4GefY.jpg","score":null},{"id":"reading-notes-p1-flash38","ideaId":"reading-notes","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Margin Notes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A reading journal organized around books, short reflections, tags, and a visual reading timeline.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Add a book and reflection, filter by tag, and verify the timeline persists.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Do not reproduce copyrighted book passages; synthetic notes only.\n\nCreative direction: A warm library catalogue. Use ivory, near-black, muted ochre, serif book titles, and compact catalogue labels. Lead with a searchable shelf and tag filters, then a focused reflection editor. The reading timeline should read like a personal journal, with dates and short original reflections rather than decorative book quotations.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":196,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/reading-notes-p1-flash38-vZRVVj1OI-Rq4UGS6tB7EwLZ_r4.jpg","score":null},{"id":"reading-notes-p2-flash36","ideaId":"reading-notes","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Margin Notes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A reading journal organized around books, short reflections, tags, and a visual reading timeline.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Add a book and reflection, filter by tag, and verify the timeline persists.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Do not reproduce copyrighted book passages; synthetic notes only.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary literary magazine notebook. Use white, deep burgundy, generous margins, and deliberate type contrast. Feature the current book in an asymmetric editorial panel, then list reflections chronologically with useful tag chips. Make adding a book and returning to saved notes quick and unobtrusive.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":96,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/reading-notes-p2-flash36-rMUBGpFsF0SKAfapCz0ugbuQceM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"reading-notes-p2-flash38","ideaId":"reading-notes","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Margin Notes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A reading journal organized around books, short reflections, tags, and a visual reading timeline.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Add a book and reflection, filter by tag, and verify the timeline persists.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Do not reproduce copyrighted book passages; synthetic notes only.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary literary magazine notebook. Use white, deep burgundy, generous margins, and deliberate type contrast. Feature the current book in an asymmetric editorial panel, then list reflections chronologically with useful tag chips. Make adding a book and returning to saved notes quick and unobtrusive.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":191,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/reading-notes-p2-flash38-LwilCrG9j3H-M-y7sYnB1EJk5bI.jpg","score":null},{"id":"reading-notes-p3-flash36","ideaId":"reading-notes","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Margin Notes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A reading journal organized around books, short reflections, tags, and a visual reading timeline.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Add a book and reflection, filter by tag, and verify the timeline persists.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Do not reproduce copyrighted book passages; synthetic notes only.\n\nCreative direction: A minimal reader's desk. Use pale gray, dark navy, a restrained green accent, and quiet sans-serif typography. Organize books as a narrow indexed list beside the active journal entry, with a clear timeline tab. Prioritize reading and writing comfort, visible save feedback, and strong empty states over cover-art decoration.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":81,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/reading-notes-p3-flash36-aV64VhK8bfbkQtGIgvALRtTtOd8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"reading-notes-p3-flash38","ideaId":"reading-notes","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Margin Notes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A reading journal organized around books, short reflections, tags, and a visual reading timeline.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Add a book and reflection, filter by tag, and verify the timeline persists.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Do not reproduce copyrighted book passages; synthetic notes only.\n\nCreative direction: A minimal reader's desk. Use pale gray, dark navy, a restrained green accent, and quiet sans-serif typography. Organize books as a narrow indexed list beside the active journal entry, with a clear timeline tab. Prioritize reading and writing comfort, visible save feedback, and strong empty states over cover-art decoration.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":147,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/reading-notes-p3-flash38-zeZRYQd6TImx-AtX7rZX7EUgqHc.jpg","score":null},{"id":"team-decisions-p1-flash36","ideaId":"team-decisions","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Decision Log\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A small team's decision journal with proposals, alternatives, comments, and recorded outcomes.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, comment from a second demo account, and record a decision with history.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Explicit team access checks; no private company documents.\n\nCreative direction: A crisp editorial decision register. Use white, ink, a modest blue accent, and carefully aligned tables. Lead with proposals grouped by status, then show a decision page with alternatives, comments, and a clear outcome timeline. Team access and the currently signed-in account must be explicit.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":74,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/team-decisions-p1-flash36-fN_wVaCG83862nKhuKtUINWCbPU.jpg","score":null},{"id":"team-decisions-p1-flash38","ideaId":"team-decisions","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Decision Log\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A small team's decision journal with proposals, alternatives, comments, and recorded outcomes.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, comment from a second demo account, and record a decision with history.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Explicit team access checks; no private company documents.\n\nCreative direction: A crisp editorial decision register. Use white, ink, a modest blue accent, and carefully aligned tables. Lead with proposals grouped by status, then show a decision page with alternatives, comments, and a clear outcome timeline. Team access and the currently signed-in account must be explicit.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":272,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/team-decisions-p1-flash38-pNEt_5M5_llA6Uo0k02WmcV46cE.jpg","score":null},{"id":"team-decisions-p2-flash36","ideaId":"team-decisions","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Decision Log\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A small team's decision journal with proposals, alternatives, comments, and recorded outcomes.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, comment from a second demo account, and record a decision with history.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Explicit team access checks; no private company documents.\n\nCreative direction: A collaborative strategy notebook. Use pale cream, dark green, warm gray, and readable serif section titles. Present a proposal as a structured document with adjacent alternatives and a compact discussion rail. Separate exploratory comments from the recorded decision and its history with clear headings and dates.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":163,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/team-decisions-p2-flash36-GTFLkw-9b_Iox6XKAfq6jx2wy70.jpg","score":null},{"id":"team-decisions-p2-flash38","ideaId":"team-decisions","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Decision Log\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A small team's decision journal with proposals, alternatives, comments, and recorded outcomes.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, comment from a second demo account, and record a decision with history.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Explicit team access checks; no private company documents.\n\nCreative direction: A collaborative strategy notebook. Use pale cream, dark green, warm gray, and readable serif section titles. Present a proposal as a structured document with adjacent alternatives and a compact discussion rail. Separate exploratory comments from the recorded decision and its history with clear headings and dates.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":248,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/team-decisions-p2-flash38-1OZM6CkMmHDJ7nmjvqNipEF_1g0.jpg","score":null},{"id":"team-decisions-p3-flash36","ideaId":"team-decisions","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Decision Log\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A small team's decision journal with proposals, alternatives, comments, and recorded outcomes.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, comment from a second demo account, and record a decision with history.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Explicit team access checks; no private company documents.\n\nCreative direction: A compact operations console for small teams. Use cool gray, midnight blue, a restrained orange accent, and dense but comfortable sans-serif typography. Combine a filterable proposal list with a detail pane and a fixed outcome summary. Distinguish pending proposals, decided items, and history without relying on color alone.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":115,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/team-decisions-p3-flash36-ZP-fkPsrNnj78kmpLVoZPSSPaJg.jpg","score":null},{"id":"team-decisions-p3-flash38","ideaId":"team-decisions","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Decision Log\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A small team's decision journal with proposals, alternatives, comments, and recorded outcomes.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Create a proposal, comment from a second demo account, and record a decision with history.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Explicit team access checks; no private company documents.\n\nCreative direction: A compact operations console for small teams. Use cool gray, midnight blue, a restrained orange accent, and dense but comfortable sans-serif typography. Combine a filterable proposal list with a detail pane and a fixed outcome summary. Distinguish pending proposals, decided items, and history without relying on color alone.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":193,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/team-decisions-p3-flash38-bh1S6WqW8qaXbz-QjWWQyIJAdkA.jpg","score":null},{"id":"garden-planner-p1-flash36","ideaId":"garden-planner","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Plot & Season\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A raised-bed garden planner with a drag-and-drop plot, task calendar, and harvest journal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Place plants, save a plot, and add a dated harvest entry.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No pesticide guidance; growing suggestions are illustrative, not localized advice.\n\nCreative direction: A graph-paper garden notebook. Use cream, moss, fine grid lines, and botanical spot illustrations. Give the plot canvas the main stage, a compact plant palette at the side, and an accessible list-based placement alternative. Place dated tasks and the harvest journal below in a clear seasonal sequence.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":97,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/garden-planner-p1-flash36-FO9cdPpxnMqSGXs_DJEvM541pmI.jpg","score":null},{"id":"garden-planner-p1-flash38","ideaId":"garden-planner","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Plot & Season\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A raised-bed garden planner with a drag-and-drop plot, task calendar, and harvest journal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Place plants, save a plot, and add a dated harvest entry.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No pesticide guidance; growing suggestions are illustrative, not localized advice.\n\nCreative direction: A graph-paper garden notebook. Use cream, moss, fine grid lines, and botanical spot illustrations. Give the plot canvas the main stage, a compact plant palette at the side, and an accessible list-based placement alternative. Place dated tasks and the harvest journal below in a clear seasonal sequence.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":164,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/garden-planner-p1-flash38-Cm_Bst918Rus2BXO7iPQTphle9A.jpg","score":null},{"id":"garden-planner-p2-flash36","ideaId":"garden-planner","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Plot & Season\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A raised-bed garden planner with a drag-and-drop plot, task calendar, and harvest journal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Place plants, save a plot, and add a dated harvest entry.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No pesticide guidance; growing suggestions are illustrative, not localized advice.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary allotment planning desk. Use white, deep green, terracotta accents, and tidy rectangular controls. Lead with saved beds and a clean top-down plot diagram, followed by a practical task calendar. Make placement, saving, and harvest logging obvious and ensure touch users are not dependent on precise dragging.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":200,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/garden-planner-p2-flash36-BuCNW375a4ffck6rxtgf6Is4UxM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"garden-planner-p2-flash38","ideaId":"garden-planner","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Plot & Season\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A raised-bed garden planner with a drag-and-drop plot, task calendar, and harvest journal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Place plants, save a plot, and add a dated harvest entry.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No pesticide guidance; growing suggestions are illustrative, not localized advice.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary allotment planning desk. Use white, deep green, terracotta accents, and tidy rectangular controls. Lead with saved beds and a clean top-down plot diagram, followed by a practical task calendar. Make placement, saving, and harvest logging obvious and ensure touch users are not dependent on precise dragging.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":240,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/garden-planner-p2-flash38-uR5YICQUa-h_1-YBbLIcKzDxc2w.jpg","score":null},{"id":"garden-planner-p3-flash36","ideaId":"garden-planner","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Plot & Season\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A raised-bed garden planner with a drag-and-drop plot, task calendar, and harvest journal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Place plants, save a plot, and add a dated harvest entry.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No pesticide guidance; growing suggestions are illustrative, not localized advice.\n\nCreative direction: A botanical studio planner. Use pale sage, dark ink, plum accents, expressive serif plant names, and restrained hand-drawn-style illustrations. Balance a large plot layout with compact planting cards and a chronological harvest ledger. Keep the calendar readable and all growing suggestions visibly illustrative.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":105,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/garden-planner-p3-flash36-jpCDumo91yWmtx1OJBOx8iV1WRA.jpg","score":null},{"id":"garden-planner-p3-flash38","ideaId":"garden-planner","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Plot & Season\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A raised-bed garden planner with a drag-and-drop plot, task calendar, and harvest journal.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Place plants, save a plot, and add a dated harvest entry.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No pesticide guidance; growing suggestions are illustrative, not localized advice.\n\nCreative direction: A botanical studio planner. Use pale sage, dark ink, plum accents, expressive serif plant names, and restrained hand-drawn-style illustrations. Balance a large plot layout with compact planting cards and a chronological harvest ledger. Keep the calendar readable and all growing suggestions visibly illustrative.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":299,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/garden-planner-p3-flash38-8GxPO6OMOtKf7SHywZLLO8zJ3s8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"design-brief-p1-flash36","ideaId":"design-brief","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Brief Builder\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A structured client brief tool that turns questionnaire answers into an editable creative brief.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Complete the questionnaire, generate a draft, and save manual edits without losing them.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: AI drafts must be labeled; avoid sending sensitive client data in the demo.\n\nCreative direction: A design-studio worksheet. Use black, white, sharp orange blocks, and strong serif/sans-serif contrast. Lead with a numbered questionnaire, show progress without overwhelming the page, and transition into an editable document preview. AI-generated wording must be visibly labeled as a draft and manual changes must feel safe.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":126,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/design-brief-p1-flash36-k2TgOdzcMDYVjrttMRKq0pYqVXw.jpg","score":null},{"id":"design-brief-p1-flash38","ideaId":"design-brief","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Brief Builder\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A structured client brief tool that turns questionnaire answers into an editable creative brief.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Complete the questionnaire, generate a draft, and save manual edits without losing them.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: AI drafts must be labeled; avoid sending sensitive client data in the demo.\n\nCreative direction: A design-studio worksheet. Use black, white, sharp orange blocks, and strong serif/sans-serif contrast. Lead with a numbered questionnaire, show progress without overwhelming the page, and transition into an editable document preview. AI-generated wording must be visibly labeled as a draft and manual changes must feel safe.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":173,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/design-brief-p1-flash38-Fv-eXsydiGHx9_xwrFFoynMpMp4.jpg","score":null},{"id":"design-brief-p2-flash36","ideaId":"design-brief","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Brief Builder\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A structured client brief tool that turns questionnaire answers into an editable creative brief.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Complete the questionnaire, generate a draft, and save manual edits without losing them.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: AI drafts must be labeled; avoid sending sensitive client data in the demo.\n\nCreative direction: A calm consultant's briefing room. Use ivory, navy, pale blue, and generous input spacing. Organize the questions into a short section navigator beside the active form, then show the resulting brief in a clean reading layout. Prioritize clear field labels, save state, and a deliberate generate action.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":82,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/design-brief-p2-flash36-gMLrzQjW0k9YrvAjR4KtWkc1Hp0.jpg","score":null},{"id":"design-brief-p2-flash38","ideaId":"design-brief","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Brief Builder\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A structured client brief tool that turns questionnaire answers into an editable creative brief.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Complete the questionnaire, generate a draft, and save manual edits without losing them.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: AI drafts must be labeled; avoid sending sensitive client data in the demo.\n\nCreative direction: A calm consultant's briefing room. Use ivory, navy, pale blue, and generous input spacing. Organize the questions into a short section navigator beside the active form, then show the resulting brief in a clean reading layout. Prioritize clear field labels, save state, and a deliberate generate action.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":174,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/design-brief-p2-flash38-qtyvLxuVBEVALdtg8nH8VrxwCQs.jpg","score":null},{"id":"design-brief-p3-flash36","ideaId":"design-brief","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Brief Builder\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A structured client brief tool that turns questionnaire answers into an editable creative brief.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Complete the questionnaire, generate a draft, and save manual edits without losing them.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: AI drafts must be labeled; avoid sending sensitive client data in the demo.\n\nCreative direction: An editorial creative-direction workbook. Use warm gray, burgundy, compact labels, and large document section headings. Present questions as purposeful prompts rather than chat bubbles, with a summary of answers before draft generation. The editor should preserve the document's hierarchy and make it clear when text is authored, AI-drafted, or manually revised.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":79,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/design-brief-p3-flash36--rXaSZU60dbS_fd_domhnHFBHt0.jpg","score":null},{"id":"design-brief-p3-flash38","ideaId":"design-brief","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Brief Builder\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A structured client brief tool that turns questionnaire answers into an editable creative brief.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Complete the questionnaire, generate a draft, and save manual edits without losing them.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: AI drafts must be labeled; avoid sending sensitive client data in the demo.\n\nCreative direction: An editorial creative-direction workbook. Use warm gray, burgundy, compact labels, and large document section headings. Present questions as purposeful prompts rather than chat bubbles, with a summary of answers before draft generation. The editor should preserve the document's hierarchy and make it clear when text is authored, AI-drafted, or manually revised.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":189,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/design-brief-p3-flash38-BdKptHWqussKc-1EOuGziOQVctw.jpg","score":null},{"id":"packing-board-p1-flash36","ideaId":"packing-board","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Pack Together\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A group trip packing board with shared items, ownership, and personal checklists.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a shared item, mark it packed, and show consistent group progress after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No live travel booking or precise itinerary disclosure.\n\nCreative direction: A shared travel field kit. Use cream, dark teal, muted orange, and luggage-tag-inspired labels without excessive decoration. Split shared gear from personal checklists, show ownership prominently, and pin a concise packed-versus-needed summary. The main board should be usable with one hand on a phone.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":146,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/packing-board-p1-flash36-e7u7PRPWI_Cv6TjsJNdddH1jrgc.jpg","score":null},{"id":"packing-board-p1-flash38","ideaId":"packing-board","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Pack Together\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A group trip packing board with shared items, ownership, and personal checklists.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a shared item, mark it packed, and show consistent group progress after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No live travel booking or precise itinerary disclosure.\n\nCreative direction: A shared travel field kit. Use cream, dark teal, muted orange, and luggage-tag-inspired labels without excessive decoration. Split shared gear from personal checklists, show ownership prominently, and pin a concise packed-versus-needed summary. The main board should be usable with one hand on a phone.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":141,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/packing-board-p1-flash38-aTU52WdSGI0DSrAFQuCMb83s46E.jpg","score":null},{"id":"packing-board-p2-flash36","ideaId":"packing-board","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Pack Together\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A group trip packing board with shared items, ownership, and personal checklists.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a shared item, mark it packed, and show consistent group progress after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No live travel booking or precise itinerary disclosure.\n\nCreative direction: A practical expedition checklist. Use white, graphite, bright yellow accents, and compact table-like rows. Organize items by category with clear owner and packed controls on every row. Keep group progress above the list and use simple tabs for shared and personal items rather than a sprawling dashboard.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":110,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/packing-board-p2-flash36-_8H68lJeeFjK7y4MYTDENZOi7AE.jpg","score":null},{"id":"packing-board-p2-flash38","ideaId":"packing-board","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Pack Together\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A group trip packing board with shared items, ownership, and personal checklists.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a shared item, mark it packed, and show consistent group progress after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No live travel booking or precise itinerary disclosure.\n\nCreative direction: A practical expedition checklist. Use white, graphite, bright yellow accents, and compact table-like rows. Organize items by category with clear owner and packed controls on every row. Keep group progress above the list and use simple tabs for shared and personal items rather than a sprawling dashboard.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":153,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/packing-board-p2-flash38-y4KchbkC084tzdm_wMGRzfk_MtQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"packing-board-p3-flash36","ideaId":"packing-board","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Pack Together\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A group trip packing board with shared items, ownership, and personal checklists.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a shared item, mark it packed, and show consistent group progress after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No live travel booking or precise itinerary disclosure.\n\nCreative direction: A friendly weekend-trip planner. Use pale sky blue, navy, coral sparingly, and rounded but restrained cards. Give each packing category a clear heading, place shared-item assignments in a small owner column, and show personal tasks in a focused side panel. Avoid destination maps or precise itinerary details.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":176,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/packing-board-p3-flash36-azl_6rPsPuMf55CKW-NaqMAh-ZM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"packing-board-p3-flash38","ideaId":"packing-board","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Pack Together\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A group trip packing board with shared items, ownership, and personal checklists.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a shared item, mark it packed, and show consistent group progress after reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No live travel booking or precise itinerary disclosure.\n\nCreative direction: A friendly weekend-trip planner. Use pale sky blue, navy, coral sparingly, and rounded but restrained cards. Give each packing category a clear heading, place shared-item assignments in a small owner column, and show personal tasks in a focused side panel. Avoid destination maps or precise itinerary details.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":233,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/packing-board-p3-flash38-h7Y4j8CbaAiGjcD4ooaantejc-Y.jpg","score":null},{"id":"market-vendors-p1-flash36","ideaId":"market-vendors","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Market Day\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A local maker market directory with a stall map, vendor profiles, and a saved shopping route.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter vendors, save favorites, and produce a useful ordered stall checklist.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use a fictional venue and seeded vendors; no external maps required.\n\nCreative direction: A colorful neighborhood maker-market program. Use cream, cobalt, coral, and bold handbill-style headings with clean sans-serif details. Put a schematic stall map beside category filters and a compact vendor list. Favorites should become a clearly ordered stall checklist, not a pretend turn-by-turn navigation feature.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":201,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/market-vendors-p1-flash36-1WvnTOEw-_0AgbEfsfgbsKZdNGg.jpg","score":null},{"id":"market-vendors-p1-flash38","ideaId":"market-vendors","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Market Day\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A local maker market directory with a stall map, vendor profiles, and a saved shopping route.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter vendors, save favorites, and produce a useful ordered stall checklist.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use a fictional venue and seeded vendors; no external maps required.\n\nCreative direction: A colorful neighborhood maker-market program. Use cream, cobalt, coral, and bold handbill-style headings with clean sans-serif details. Put a schematic stall map beside category filters and a compact vendor list. Favorites should become a clearly ordered stall checklist, not a pretend turn-by-turn navigation feature.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":264,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/market-vendors-p1-flash38-rmdRiLAFFtH7Jn_mK52fcmPJXLQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"market-vendors-p2-flash36","ideaId":"market-vendors","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Market Day\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A local maker market directory with a stall map, vendor profiles, and a saved shopping route.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter vendors, save favorites, and produce a useful ordered stall checklist.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use a fictional venue and seeded vendors; no external maps required.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary craft fair field guide. Use warm white, dark green, ochre accents, and refined serif vendor names. Lead with a clean diagrammatic venue map, then show maker profiles with authored descriptions and useful stall numbers. The saved route should resemble a simple pocket itinerary for a fictional venue.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":171,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/market-vendors-p2-flash36-6WQSWWLEG8sDO9NOqeZjqOHFVn8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"market-vendors-p2-flash38","ideaId":"market-vendors","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Market Day\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A local maker market directory with a stall map, vendor profiles, and a saved shopping route.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter vendors, save favorites, and produce a useful ordered stall checklist.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use a fictional venue and seeded vendors; no external maps required.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary craft fair field guide. Use warm white, dark green, ochre accents, and refined serif vendor names. Lead with a clean diagrammatic venue map, then show maker profiles with authored descriptions and useful stall numbers. The saved route should resemble a simple pocket itinerary for a fictional venue.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":280,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/market-vendors-p2-flash38-hxZiLJvRV_2TZkWVpxs9MMv-0Hc.jpg","score":null},{"id":"market-vendors-p3-flash36","ideaId":"market-vendors","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Market Day\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A local maker market directory with a stall map, vendor profiles, and a saved shopping route.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter vendors, save favorites, and produce a useful ordered stall checklist.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use a fictional venue and seeded vendors; no external maps required.\n\nCreative direction: A practical market information kiosk. Use pale gray, black, a vivid blue accent, and highly legible signage typography. Make filtering, stall lookup, and favorites the main actions, with a list/map switch that works well on mobile. Highlight the selected stall clearly and keep the ordered checklist easy to scan.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":92,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/market-vendors-p3-flash36-0cdvhRX1NlSNxXgu3NuRmB-3BD8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"market-vendors-p3-flash38","ideaId":"market-vendors","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Market Day\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A local maker market directory with a stall map, vendor profiles, and a saved shopping route.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Filter vendors, save favorites, and produce a useful ordered stall checklist.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use a fictional venue and seeded vendors; no external maps required.\n\nCreative direction: A practical market information kiosk. Use pale gray, black, a vivid blue accent, and highly legible signage typography. Make filtering, stall lookup, and favorites the main actions, with a list/map switch that works well on mobile. Highlight the selected stall clearly and keep the ordered checklist easy to scan.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":340,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/market-vendors-p3-flash38-acT2RBMRF00YqeUs_BlY7yBzu5o.jpg","score":null},{"id":"audio-feedback-p1-flash36","ideaId":"audio-feedback","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Listening Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A musician's private demo feedback room with timestamped comments and version comparisons.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play an owned sample, add a timestamped comment, and seek back to that moment.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Owned audio only; validate storage, seeking, and upload limits before generation.\n\nCreative direction: A restrained recording-studio listening desk. Use charcoal, warm white, amber accents, and clear transport controls. Make the real playable audio timeline central, with timestamped feedback immediately below and an obvious version selector. Visualize real media information where available; do not draw a fake waveform that claims to represent the sample.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":91,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/audio-feedback-p1-flash36-Elhs2CTzS0f9SH729dB2zD7cRck.jpg","score":null},{"id":"audio-feedback-p1-flash38","ideaId":"audio-feedback","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Listening Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A musician's private demo feedback room with timestamped comments and version comparisons.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play an owned sample, add a timestamped comment, and seek back to that moment.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Owned audio only; validate storage, seeking, and upload limits before generation.\n\nCreative direction: A restrained recording-studio listening desk. Use charcoal, warm white, amber accents, and clear transport controls. Make the real playable audio timeline central, with timestamped feedback immediately below and an obvious version selector. Visualize real media information where available; do not draw a fake waveform that claims to represent the sample.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":274,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/audio-feedback-p1-flash38-c80L1W5WoAZ3Lk8Ax00ZjmRQdOQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"audio-feedback-p2-flash36","ideaId":"audio-feedback","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Listening Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A musician's private demo feedback room with timestamped comments and version comparisons.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play an owned sample, add a timestamped comment, and seek back to that moment.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Owned audio only; validate storage, seeking, and upload limits before generation.\n\nCreative direction: A clean producer's review sheet. Use white, navy, a restrained red accent, and compact monospace timestamps. Pair a generous player with a chronological comment list and a small version comparison header. Seeking from comments should be direct, keyboard-accessible, and reflected in the actual playback position.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":146,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/audio-feedback-p2-flash36-4hmE_PXJQW3W7J5d6cbVYaeUm8Y.jpg","score":null},{"id":"audio-feedback-p2-flash38","ideaId":"audio-feedback","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Listening Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A musician's private demo feedback room with timestamped comments and version comparisons.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play an owned sample, add a timestamped comment, and seek back to that moment.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Owned audio only; validate storage, seeking, and upload limits before generation.\n\nCreative direction: A clean producer's review sheet. Use white, navy, a restrained red accent, and compact monospace timestamps. Pair a generous player with a chronological comment list and a small version comparison header. Seeking from comments should be direct, keyboard-accessible, and reflected in the actual playback position.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":278,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/audio-feedback-p2-flash38-4s2wHrX8A1_jFL5ow3JlfrXnUco.jpg","score":null},{"id":"audio-feedback-p3-flash36","ideaId":"audio-feedback","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Listening Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A musician's private demo feedback room with timestamped comments and version comparisons.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play an owned sample, add a timestamped comment, and seek back to that moment.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Owned audio only; validate storage, seeking, and upload limits before generation.\n\nCreative direction: An intimate album-workshop room. Use deep plum, pale warm text, subtle lavender borders, and elegant track titles. Give the active version a focused listening panel, while alternate versions and feedback remain visible in a narrow side rail. Avoid decorative equalizers; actual playback and useful timestamp navigation should provide the motion.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":90,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/audio-feedback-p3-flash36-jEMz0KulNUVCAqHp43z0OugmIZw.jpg","score":null},{"id":"audio-feedback-p3-flash38","ideaId":"audio-feedback","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Listening Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A musician's private demo feedback room with timestamped comments and version comparisons.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play an owned sample, add a timestamped comment, and seek back to that moment.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Owned audio only; validate storage, seeking, and upload limits before generation.\n\nCreative direction: An intimate album-workshop room. Use deep plum, pale warm text, subtle lavender borders, and elegant track titles. Give the active version a focused listening panel, while alternate versions and feedback remain visible in a narrow side rail. Avoid decorative equalizers; actual playback and useful timestamp navigation should provide the motion.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":188,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/audio-feedback-p3-flash38-Q3OzDV-qqVFJkxG0AsuMDEGofiY.jpg","score":null},{"id":"neighborhood-lending-p1-flash36","ideaId":"neighborhood-lending","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Borrow Shelf\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A neighbors' item lending library with availability, requests, and owner approval.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Request an item, approve it as its owner, and prevent overlapping approved loans.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Fictional users; no addresses, deposits, identity verification, or liability promises.\n\nCreative direction: A friendly neighborhood lending library. Use warm ivory, dark green, mustard accents, and library-card-style item details. Put availability and request dates directly on inventory cards, with a clearly separated owner approval inbox. Never imply identity verification; fictional demo users should be visibly labeled.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":128,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/neighborhood-lending-p1-flash36-JyvzemcNvIUPEfpOn05wawU5lvQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"neighborhood-lending-p1-flash38","ideaId":"neighborhood-lending","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Borrow Shelf\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A neighbors' item lending library with availability, requests, and owner approval.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Request an item, approve it as its owner, and prevent overlapping approved loans.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Fictional users; no addresses, deposits, identity verification, or liability promises.\n\nCreative direction: A friendly neighborhood lending library. Use warm ivory, dark green, mustard accents, and library-card-style item details. Put availability and request dates directly on inventory cards, with a clearly separated owner approval inbox. Never imply identity verification; fictional demo users should be visibly labeled.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":198,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/neighborhood-lending-p1-flash38-uO24faxyQv5r_F-h_djj7eWYFzY.jpg","score":null},{"id":"neighborhood-lending-p2-flash36","ideaId":"neighborhood-lending","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Borrow Shelf\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A neighbors' item lending library with availability, requests, and owner approval.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Request an item, approve it as its owner, and prevent overlapping approved loans.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Fictional users; no addresses, deposits, identity verification, or liability promises.\n\nCreative direction: A practical shared-tool inventory. Use pale gray, navy, orange accents, and straightforward sans-serif type. Organize items in a filterable grid with a useful availability panel and simple date-range requests. Make pending requests and approved loans visually distinct, and keep owner actions explicit.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":100,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/neighborhood-lending-p2-flash36-_Wl02dHfm2lVTx59iy-RO6bHyJE.jpg","score":null},{"id":"neighborhood-lending-p2-flash38","ideaId":"neighborhood-lending","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Borrow Shelf\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A neighbors' item lending library with availability, requests, and owner approval.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Request an item, approve it as its owner, and prevent overlapping approved loans.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Fictional users; no addresses, deposits, identity verification, or liability promises.\n\nCreative direction: A practical shared-tool inventory. Use pale gray, navy, orange accents, and straightforward sans-serif type. Organize items in a filterable grid with a useful availability panel and simple date-range requests. Make pending requests and approved loans visually distinct, and keep owner actions explicit.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":234,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/neighborhood-lending-p2-flash38-MHnWjZ95QXV7r5bb3JHftVjE1Ew.jpg","score":null},{"id":"neighborhood-lending-p3-flash36","ideaId":"neighborhood-lending","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Borrow Shelf\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A neighbors' item lending library with availability, requests, and owner approval.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Request an item, approve it as its owner, and prevent overlapping approved loans.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Fictional users; no addresses, deposits, identity verification, or liability promises.\n\nCreative direction: A community shelf catalogue. Use white, burgundy, pale pink accents, serif item headings, and generous photography crops. Let the selected item open into a clear lending detail page with dates, owner, and request status. Approved reservations should appear in an understandable schedule without exposing addresses or personal contact details.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":134,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/neighborhood-lending-p3-flash36-Chbu8T-cdBwSbESGvzcnExEO47E.jpg","score":null},{"id":"neighborhood-lending-p3-flash38","ideaId":"neighborhood-lending","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Borrow Shelf\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A neighbors' item lending library with availability, requests, and owner approval.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Request an item, approve it as its owner, and prevent overlapping approved loans.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Fictional users; no addresses, deposits, identity verification, or liability promises.\n\nCreative direction: A community shelf catalogue. Use white, burgundy, pale pink accents, serif item headings, and generous photography crops. Let the selected item open into a clear lending detail page with dates, owner, and request status. Approved reservations should appear in an understandable schedule without exposing addresses or personal contact details.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":258,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/neighborhood-lending-p3-flash38-H8BHOFXp2jxzXDAYjdzbFyLO2JM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"data-story-p1-flash36","ideaId":"data-story","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Chart Story\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A guided data-story builder that imports a small CSV and pairs charts with an authored explanation.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Import a bounded synthetic CSV, choose a chart, and save an annotated story.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Validate file sizes and types; escape CSV content; no arbitrary code evaluation.\n\nCreative direction: A newsroom data-graphics desk. Use white, black, restrained blue, and compact editorial typography. Put the bounded CSV import and field selection beside a real chart preview, then provide a generous annotation editor. Published-looking stories should foreground the data source, chart labels, and authored explanation.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":129,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/data-story-p1-flash36-B5vuPAbQER4kvyTcblPuArr-Ag4.jpg","score":null},{"id":"data-story-p1-flash38","ideaId":"data-story","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Chart Story\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A guided data-story builder that imports a small CSV and pairs charts with an authored explanation.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Import a bounded synthetic CSV, choose a chart, and save an annotated story.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Validate file sizes and types; escape CSV content; no arbitrary code evaluation.\n\nCreative direction: A newsroom data-graphics desk. Use white, black, restrained blue, and compact editorial typography. Put the bounded CSV import and field selection beside a real chart preview, then provide a generous annotation editor. Published-looking stories should foreground the data source, chart labels, and authored explanation.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":302,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/data-story-p1-flash38-_GBG5VlfP3vzyNr_NOqTWFjnbSk.jpg","score":null},{"id":"data-story-p2-flash36","ideaId":"data-story","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Chart Story\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A guided data-story builder that imports a small CSV and pairs charts with an authored explanation.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Import a bounded synthetic CSV, choose a chart, and save an annotated story.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Validate file sizes and types; escape CSV content; no arbitrary code evaluation.\n\nCreative direction: A small research report studio. Use cream, dark indigo, muted gold accents, and serif story titles. Structure the workflow as data, chart, and narrative sections with a consistent preview panel. Favor restrained chart decoration, readable axes, and useful error messages for malformed or oversized CSV files.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":144,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/data-story-p2-flash36-SzXjIzzdDpH8AlWpoo1EB4SxbKM.jpg","score":null},{"id":"data-story-p2-flash38","ideaId":"data-story","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Chart Story\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A guided data-story builder that imports a small CSV and pairs charts with an authored explanation.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Import a bounded synthetic CSV, choose a chart, and save an annotated story.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Validate file sizes and types; escape CSV content; no arbitrary code evaluation.\n\nCreative direction: A small research report studio. Use cream, dark indigo, muted gold accents, and serif story titles. Structure the workflow as data, chart, and narrative sections with a consistent preview panel. Favor restrained chart decoration, readable axes, and useful error messages for malformed or oversized CSV files.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":315,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/data-story-p2-flash38-pNVe10T6m1uSwhE8T9F9HOhWxiI.jpg","score":null},{"id":"data-story-p3-flash36","ideaId":"data-story","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Chart Story\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A guided data-story builder that imports a small CSV and pairs charts with an authored explanation.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Import a bounded synthetic CSV, choose a chart, and save an annotated story.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Validate file sizes and types; escape CSV content; no arbitrary code evaluation.\n\nCreative direction: A modern civic data notebook. Use pale gray, forest green, coral sparingly, and highly readable sans-serif labels. Lead with a concise data table preview, then a chart-type selector and explanatory text blocks. Use a compact saved-story index and keep all displayed CSV text safely treated as data, never executable markup.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":118,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/data-story-p3-flash36-PnoPKjTJ_gJgvJiUHiVMdiBWTOA.jpg","score":null},{"id":"data-story-p3-flash38","ideaId":"data-story","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Chart Story\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A guided data-story builder that imports a small CSV and pairs charts with an authored explanation.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Import a bounded synthetic CSV, choose a chart, and save an annotated story.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Validate file sizes and types; escape CSV content; no arbitrary code evaluation.\n\nCreative direction: A modern civic data notebook. Use pale gray, forest green, coral sparingly, and highly readable sans-serif labels. Lead with a concise data table preview, then a chart-type selector and explanatory text blocks. Use a compact saved-story index and keep all displayed CSV text safely treated as data, never executable markup.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":184,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/data-story-p3-flash38-yMeyNsM38CkUQi_YW3tS0dUTT-M.jpg","score":null},{"id":"oral-history-p1-flash36","ideaId":"oral-history","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Story Archive\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A family-history archive of consented audio clips, transcripts, and related objects.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play a seeded recording and browse its transcript and linked objects.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic or explicitly consented stories; transcription integration is unverified.\n\nCreative direction: An intimate archival reading room. Use warm parchment, brown-black typography, serif story titles, and carefully framed synthetic portraits or object images. Pair a real audio player with a readable transcript and a small linked-object shelf. Clearly label synthetic or consented source material and avoid sentimental visual clutter.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":207,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/oral-history-p1-flash36-9b90rHf0bCFuY9aYMae1rCNocc0.jpg","score":null},{"id":"oral-history-p1-flash38","ideaId":"oral-history","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Story Archive\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A family-history archive of consented audio clips, transcripts, and related objects.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play a seeded recording and browse its transcript and linked objects.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic or explicitly consented stories; transcription integration is unverified.\n\nCreative direction: An intimate archival reading room. Use warm parchment, brown-black typography, serif story titles, and carefully framed synthetic portraits or object images. Pair a real audio player with a readable transcript and a small linked-object shelf. Clearly label synthetic or consented source material and avoid sentimental visual clutter.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":202,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/oral-history-p1-flash38-RzBwNBBiH5hCtMWV_DV-SwLjTfA.jpg","score":null},{"id":"oral-history-p2-flash36","ideaId":"oral-history","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Story Archive\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A family-history archive of consented audio clips, transcripts, and related objects.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play a seeded recording and browse its transcript and linked objects.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic or explicitly consented stories; transcription integration is unverified.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary oral-history catalogue. Use white, navy, muted rust accents, and compact archival metadata. Start with recording entries arranged as a clear index, then a split audio-and-transcript detail view with related objects. Make playback, transcript navigation, and source context more prominent than decorative imagery.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":212,"timingQuality":"Interrupted or recovered","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/oral-history-p2-flash36-8VEydYMo11xxTuc4ns_R5CHdEfQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"oral-history-p2-flash38","ideaId":"oral-history","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Story Archive\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A family-history archive of consented audio clips, transcripts, and related objects.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play a seeded recording and browse its transcript and linked objects.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic or explicitly consented stories; transcription integration is unverified.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary oral-history catalogue. Use white, navy, muted rust accents, and compact archival metadata. Start with recording entries arranged as a clear index, then a split audio-and-transcript detail view with related objects. Make playback, transcript navigation, and source context more prominent than decorative imagery.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":231,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/oral-history-p2-flash38-7AdAgxA0X8fW4LsZprpYNTuQXs0.jpg","score":null},{"id":"oral-history-p3-flash36","ideaId":"oral-history","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Story Archive\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A family-history archive of consented audio clips, transcripts, and related objects.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play a seeded recording and browse its transcript and linked objects.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic or explicitly consented stories; transcription integration is unverified.\n\nCreative direction: A family memory workbook. Use pale sage, dark ink, restrained ochre, and spacious chapter headings. Organize each story around one recording, its transcript, and a small sequence of associated objects. Use quiet folder-like navigation, but keep every label legible and the media player fully functional.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":125,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/oral-history-p3-flash36-kdYkuAtiJe0SnmzH4inUw35YgVI.jpg","score":null},{"id":"oral-history-p3-flash38","ideaId":"oral-history","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Story Archive\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A family-history archive of consented audio clips, transcripts, and related objects.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Play a seeded recording and browse its transcript and linked objects.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Synthetic or explicitly consented stories; transcription integration is unverified.\n\nCreative direction: A family memory workbook. Use pale sage, dark ink, restrained ochre, and spacious chapter headings. Organize each story around one recording, its transcript, and a small sequence of associated objects. Use quiet folder-like navigation, but keep every label legible and the media player fully functional.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":259,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/oral-history-p3-flash38-ZLOhjdX4oJKjuuuRxDJXQf8p-XQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"meeting-actions-p1-flash36","ideaId":"meeting-actions","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Action Minutes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A meeting transcript workspace that drafts action items and lets people correct and assign them.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Use a synthetic transcript, generate actions, edit assignments, and persist changes.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No meeting recording or live integrations; AI output requires confirmation.\n\nCreative direction: A focused action notebook. Use white, ink, a bright but restrained green accent, and compact ownership controls. Place the synthetic transcript alongside a reviewable list of AI-drafted actions. Make confirmation, edits, assignee, and status obvious; distinguish draft suggestions from accepted tasks.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":196,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/meeting-actions-p1-flash36-KhT0IUrRPTHQm8IxBFOU4YNw5-8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"meeting-actions-p1-flash38","ideaId":"meeting-actions","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Action Minutes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A meeting transcript workspace that drafts action items and lets people correct and assign them.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Use a synthetic transcript, generate actions, edit assignments, and persist changes.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No meeting recording or live integrations; AI output requires confirmation.\n\nCreative direction: A focused action notebook. Use white, ink, a bright but restrained green accent, and compact ownership controls. Place the synthetic transcript alongside a reviewable list of AI-drafted actions. Make confirmation, edits, assignee, and status obvious; distinguish draft suggestions from accepted tasks.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":197,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/meeting-actions-p1-flash38-wCdcKvfeRTEcXlMfsqvSutlrjKA.jpg","score":null},{"id":"meeting-actions-p2-flash36","ideaId":"meeting-actions","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Action Minutes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A meeting transcript workspace that drafts action items and lets people correct and assign them.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Use a synthetic transcript, generate actions, edit assignments, and persist changes.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No meeting recording or live integrations; AI output requires confirmation.\n\nCreative direction: A compact team follow-through console. Use cool gray, navy, amber accents, and dense readable rows. Lead with meeting entries and outstanding actions, then open a transcript-and-extraction workspace. Keep real AI generation states visible and make manual corrections and saved assignments more prominent than summary decoration.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":121,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/meeting-actions-p2-flash36-86i1zlUk3T3DzKTLqhGt1uqpKUI.jpg","score":null},{"id":"meeting-actions-p2-flash38","ideaId":"meeting-actions","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Action Minutes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A meeting transcript workspace that drafts action items and lets people correct and assign them.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Use a synthetic transcript, generate actions, edit assignments, and persist changes.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No meeting recording or live integrations; AI output requires confirmation.\n\nCreative direction: A compact team follow-through console. Use cool gray, navy, amber accents, and dense readable rows. Lead with meeting entries and outstanding actions, then open a transcript-and-extraction workspace. Keep real AI generation states visible and make manual corrections and saved assignments more prominent than summary decoration.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":234,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/meeting-actions-p2-flash38-K9IGzztvp6a_p-exBUSudxOPH-8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"meeting-actions-p3-flash36","ideaId":"meeting-actions","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Action Minutes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A meeting transcript workspace that drafts action items and lets people correct and assign them.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Use a synthetic transcript, generate actions, edit assignments, and persist changes.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No meeting recording or live integrations; AI output requires confirmation.\n\nCreative direction: An editorial meeting record. Use warm ivory, burgundy, serif meeting headings, and clean ruled action tables. Present the source transcript as an expandable document, with drafted actions grouped below for explicit human review. Use clear badges reading Draft or Confirmed and preserve edits through reload.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":148,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/meeting-actions-p3-flash36-ks1GsqDUNNufHlLGIMPmcYg-5wU.jpg","score":null},{"id":"meeting-actions-p3-flash38","ideaId":"meeting-actions","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Action Minutes\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A meeting transcript workspace that drafts action items and lets people correct and assign them.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Use a synthetic transcript, generate actions, edit assignments, and persist changes.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No meeting recording or live integrations; AI output requires confirmation.\n\nCreative direction: An editorial meeting record. Use warm ivory, burgundy, serif meeting headings, and clean ruled action tables. Present the source transcript as an expandable document, with drafted actions grouped below for explicit human review. Use clear badges reading Draft or Confirmed and preserve edits through reload.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":165,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/meeting-actions-p3-flash38-J8fN3dG7iMTFvccKP3lgaXomMeo.jpg","score":null},{"id":"care-organizer-p1-flash36","ideaId":"care-organizer","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Care Calendar\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A household coordination calendar for non-medical errands, meals, and visits.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a meal delivery or errand and confirm status changes across demo accounts.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Exclude health records, medication management, medical advice, and real vulnerable-person data.\n\nCreative direction: A calm household coordination board. Use pale cream, navy, muted teal, and very clear task ownership labels. Lead with today's non-medical errands, meals, and visits, followed by a readable weekly agenda. Keep completion controls large and provide explicit household membership rather than implying that a cosmetic role switch enforces access.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":154,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/care-organizer-p1-flash36-uf-eGtqBz_y_z9P26Prye4YdGN8.jpg","score":null},{"id":"care-organizer-p1-flash38","ideaId":"care-organizer","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Care Calendar\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A household coordination calendar for non-medical errands, meals, and visits.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a meal delivery or errand and confirm status changes across demo accounts.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Exclude health records, medication management, medical advice, and real vulnerable-person data.\n\nCreative direction: A calm household coordination board. Use pale cream, navy, muted teal, and very clear task ownership labels. Lead with today's non-medical errands, meals, and visits, followed by a readable weekly agenda. Keep completion controls large and provide explicit household membership rather than implying that a cosmetic role switch enforces access.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":180,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/care-organizer-p1-flash38-Br4nDRX7DpzoDvVlsTBcYf3azuw.jpg","score":null},{"id":"care-organizer-p2-flash36","ideaId":"care-organizer","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Care Calendar\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A household coordination calendar for non-medical errands, meals, and visits.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a meal delivery or errand and confirm status changes across demo accounts.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Exclude health records, medication management, medical advice, and real vulnerable-person data.\n\nCreative direction: A practical shared family planner. Use white, dark plum, soft peach accents, and highly legible sans-serif typography. Organize tasks by day with owner chips and a concise unassigned list. Make adding an errand or meal delivery short and accessible, and give status changes immediate saved feedback.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":167,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/care-organizer-p2-flash36-lklXFsofoFDju-6sIAK4Js1fLDQ.jpg","score":null},{"id":"care-organizer-p2-flash38","ideaId":"care-organizer","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":2,"prompt":"Create \"Care Calendar\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A household coordination calendar for non-medical errands, meals, and visits.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a meal delivery or errand and confirm status changes across demo accounts.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Exclude health records, medication management, medical advice, and real vulnerable-person data.\n\nCreative direction: A practical shared family planner. Use white, dark plum, soft peach accents, and highly legible sans-serif typography. Organize tasks by day with owner chips and a concise unassigned list. Make adding an errand or meal delivery short and accessible, and give status changes immediate saved feedback.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":130,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/care-organizer-p2-flash38-GzifYSWPWjPa0TXJUjHuPdo8mzs.jpg","score":null},{"id":"care-organizer-p3-flash36","ideaId":"care-organizer","model":"gemini-3.6-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Care Calendar\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A household coordination calendar for non-medical errands, meals, and visits.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a meal delivery or errand and confirm status changes across demo accounts.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Exclude health records, medication management, medical advice, and real vulnerable-person data.\n\nCreative direction: A friendly community-style household calendar. Use pale blue, dark ink, yellow accents, and simple poster-like date numerals. Pair a weekly schedule with a compact task detail panel and a clear member filter. Avoid medical imagery or health fields entirely; the product should feel like everyday logistics, not a clinical care system.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":77,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/care-organizer-p3-flash36-53ZLyc5YfFN6PvbcDtzkkOPtX-A.jpg","score":null},{"id":"care-organizer-p3-flash38","ideaId":"care-organizer","model":"gemini-3.8-flash:agent","variation":3,"prompt":"Create \"Care Calendar\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A household coordination calendar for non-medical errands, meals, and visits.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Assign a meal delivery or errand and confirm status changes across demo accounts.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Exclude health records, medication management, medical advice, and real vulnerable-person data.\n\nCreative direction: A friendly community-style household calendar. Use pale blue, dark ink, yellow accents, and simple poster-like date numerals. Pair a weekly schedule with a compact task detail panel and a clear member filter. Avoid medical imagery or health fields entirely; the product should feel like everyday logistics, not a clinical care system.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":181,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Original Flash batch","screenshot":"screenshots/care-organizer-p3-flash38-UqnVYMnUwGAmwe5tKIIvs9m9fek.jpg","score":null},{"id":"paper-circle-p1-opus48","ideaId":"paper-circle","model":"claude-opus-4-8:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Paper Circle\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A shared reading room for research PDFs: page-linked discussion, personal notes, and AI questions grounded in each paper.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Open a seeded PDF, add a page-linked comment, ask a question, and follow the answer's citation to the supporting page.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Flagship; verify document extraction, grounding, permissions, and AI quotas before committing to the full scope.\n\nCreative direction: A scholarly journal reading room. Use warm ivory, near-black serif article titles, restrained oxblood annotations, and generous reading margins. Make the PDF page the dominant central surface, with a narrow numbered annotation rail and a compact AI drawer. The entry screen should look like a journal contents page, not a marketing hero. On mobile, switch cleanly between document, discussion, and questions.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":505,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Premium pilot","screenshot":"screenshots/paper-circle-p1-opus48-b0EQVFJGsPQ4iKUogyKQ__liFL8.jpg","score":8.7,"visualReview":{"composition":4,"readability":4,"consistency":5,"evidence":"A restrained journal layout provides a clear contents hierarchy, readable article summary and distinct Open Paper action. Typography, rules and warm neutrals are cohesive, although the oversized Contents heading consumes useful space. The synthetic-content notice is visible; source validity and application behavior are untested.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"paper-circle-p1-pro31","ideaId":"paper-circle","model":"gemini-3.1-pro-preview:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Paper Circle\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A shared reading room for research PDFs: page-linked discussion, personal notes, and AI questions grounded in each paper.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Open a seeded PDF, add a page-linked comment, ask a question, and follow the answer's citation to the supporting page.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Flagship; verify document extraction, grounding, permissions, and AI quotas before committing to the full scope.\n\nCreative direction: A scholarly journal reading room. Use warm ivory, near-black serif article titles, restrained oxblood annotations, and generous reading margins. Make the PDF page the dominant central surface, with a narrow numbered annotation rail and a compact AI drawer. The entry screen should look like a journal contents page, not a marketing hero. On mobile, switch cleanly between document, discussion, and questions.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":282,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Premium pilot","screenshot":"screenshots/paper-circle-p1-pro31-P7IfRMvR8RzMOhJYVBCyP5cNwiY.jpg","score":6.7,"visualReview":{"composition":2,"readability":4,"consistency":4,"evidence":"A cohesive cream/black research identity and readable introduction are visible, but large empty space above the headline delays the main content and no paper-opening action appears in the viewport. This score is limited to the captured opening composition, not off-screen research features.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"ceramics-workshop-p1-pro31","ideaId":"ceramics-workshop","model":"gemini-3.1-pro-preview:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Clay Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A ceramicist's class calendar with class detail pages, capacity-aware booking requests, and a simple owner view.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit a booking request, see it in the owner view, and prevent requests beyond the configured capacity.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Requests only; no real payments or calendar integrations in v1.\n\nCreative direction: An independent ceramicist's editorial studio. Use terracotta, warm chalk, expressive serif headings, and large close-up clay photographs with credible attribution. Put the next class and remaining capacity immediately above the fold, with a narrow calendar strip and asymmetrical class cards. Keep the owner view quiet and practical; avoid a generic SaaS hero.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":171,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Premium pilot","screenshot":"screenshots/ceramics-workshop-p1-pro31-0qWMNGYpRTtPwJcRE55kWvYAblw.jpg","score":7.3,"visualReview":{"composition":4,"readability":3,"consistency":4,"evidence":"Craft photography and a large serif headline create a cohesive pottery identity. The workshop card is cropped at the bottom and muted date text has weak contrast against the clay-colored background. Booking functionality and content below the fold are untested.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"ceramics-workshop-p1-opus48","ideaId":"ceramics-workshop","model":"claude-opus-4-8:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Clay Club\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A ceramicist's class calendar with class detail pages, capacity-aware booking requests, and a simple owner view.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Submit a booking request, see it in the owner view, and prevent requests beyond the configured capacity.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Requests only; no real payments or calendar integrations in v1.\n\nCreative direction: An independent ceramicist's editorial studio. Use terracotta, warm chalk, expressive serif headings, and large close-up clay photographs with credible attribution. Put the next class and remaining capacity immediately above the fold, with a narrow calendar strip and asymmetrical class cards. Keep the owner view quiet and practical; avoid a generic SaaS hero.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":400,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Premium pilot","screenshot":"screenshots/ceramics-workshop-p1-opus48-E9V52kQCUMFGQUln1e1kEkwBdfM.jpg","score":7.3,"visualReview":{"composition":3,"readability":4,"consistency":4,"evidence":"Restrained cream/black styling, a large serif headline and legible supporting copy establish a consistent studio identity. Large header spacing and a tall narrow photo push the next-class details below the fold. Owner-view and booking functionality remain untested.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"client-proofing-p1-opus48","ideaId":"client-proofing","model":"claude-opus-4-8:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Proof Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A photographer's client proofing workspace with image favorites, shot-specific comments, and a final selection summary.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select photos and add feedback; reload and verify the selection summary persists for that client.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed sample photos and synthetic clients; isolate client workspaces.\n\nCreative direction: A premium photography contact sheet. Use a charcoal workspace, neutral white labels, thin rules, and minimal controls around generous image grids. Selecting an image should open a distraction-free lightbox with a slim feedback rail and visible favorite state. Keep the final selection count anchored and the summary suitable for a real client handoff.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":544,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Premium pilot","screenshot":"screenshots/client-proofing-p1-opus48-r2dX_phTJaNXqc9Ojg8xEtTc4hI.jpg","score":null,"visualReview":{"disposition":"not-comparable","evidence":"The capture shows a dark sign-in landing screen explaining private proofing, but no gallery, selection controls or comments workspace. Its typography and sign-in action are visible; authentication itself is not a defect. A signed-in workspace capture is required for a comparable app score.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"client-proofing-p1-pro31","ideaId":"client-proofing","model":"gemini-3.1-pro-preview:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Proof Room\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A photographer's client proofing workspace with image favorites, shot-specific comments, and a final selection summary.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Select photos and add feedback; reload and verify the selection summary persists for that client.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: Use licensed sample photos and synthetic clients; isolate client workspaces.\n\nCreative direction: A premium photography contact sheet. Use a charcoal workspace, neutral white labels, thin rules, and minimal controls around generous image grids. Selecting an image should open a distraction-free lightbox with a slim feedback rail and visible favorite state. Keep the final selection count anchored and the summary suitable for a real client handoff.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":159,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Premium pilot","screenshot":"screenshots/client-proofing-p1-pro31-xYHUUvjmRhk60glcoIU0mrrbghY.jpg","score":null,"visualReview":{"disposition":"not-comparable","evidence":"The capture shows only a centered sign-in gate on a dark background, with no proofing gallery or workspace visible. Authentication is not a visual defect. An authenticated workspace capture is needed before assigning a comparable application score.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"recipe-lab-p1-pro31","ideaId":"recipe-lab","model":"gemini-3.1-pro-preview:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Recipe Lab\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A personal recipe library with serving scaling, ingredient-based search, and weekly meal collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Scale a recipe and save a weekly collection that survives reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No medical or dietary safety claims; use authored sample recipes.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary cookbook spread. Use warm ivory, tomato-red accents, generous food photography, and compact ingredient tables. Make recipe search and serving adjustment visible immediately, then arrange instructions beside scaled ingredients. Present the weekly collection as a simple seven-day planning strip with clearly saved state.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":122,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Premium pilot","screenshot":"screenshots/recipe-lab-p1-pro31-khnATuwB4DbxVIb--86u1QK2P2s.jpg","score":6,"visualReview":{"composition":2,"readability":3,"consistency":4,"evidence":"Cream background and oversized serif title establish a consistent editorial identity, but extensive empty space separates the title from the introduction. No recipe controls are visible above the fold. This score describes the captured opening composition only, not the unseen application.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}},{"id":"recipe-lab-p1-opus48","ideaId":"recipe-lab","model":"claude-opus-4-8:agent","variation":1,"prompt":"Create \"Recipe Lab\", a polished, usable demo application.\n\nProduct brief: A personal recipe library with serving scaling, ingredient-based search, and weekly meal collections.\n\nRequired acceptance workflow: Scale a recipe and save a weekly collection that survives reload.\n\nScope and safety boundaries: No medical or dietary safety claims; use authored sample recipes.\n\nCreative direction: A contemporary cookbook spread. Use warm ivory, tomato-red accents, generous food photography, and compact ingredient tables. Make recipe search and serving adjustment visible immediately, then arrange instructions beside scaled ingredients. Present the weekly collection as a simple seven-day planning strip with clearly saved state.\n\nImplementation and quality requirements: Build the working application, not just a promotional landing page. Use the platform's integrated backend, authentication, database, storage, and AI facilities where appropriate and actually available. Persist user changes across reloads; enforce permissions and shared-capacity rules in the backend, not just in hidden controls. Use synthetic demo people and authored, owned, or appropriately licensed sample media with attribution. Do not invent successful AI responses, uploads, transactions, integrations, or security guarantees. If a required capability is unavailable, expose the limitation honestly instead of faking success. Include useful empty, loading, validation, and error states. Every visible action must work or be clearly disabled with an explanation. Support mobile layouts, keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic controls, adequate contrast, and reduced motion.\n\nBefore finishing, exercise the acceptance workflow, reload to check persistence, and check the narrow-screen layout. Report actual limitations rather than claiming unperformed verification.","elapsedSeconds":277,"timingQuality":"Observed end-to-end run","cohort":"Premium pilot","screenshot":"screenshots/recipe-lab-p1-opus48-dShJ3W-F33RJDpv0rrmH94TMe7w.jpg","score":8.7,"visualReview":{"composition":4,"readability":4,"consistency":5,"evidence":"Clear recipe browse/detail hierarchy and cohesive cream/sage palette with food photography. The oversized photo pushes ingredients and method below the fold; smaller secondary labels are less legible. Serving controls are visible but untested.","scope":"Single AI reviewer; desktop screenshot only. Functionality, mobile and accessibility not tested."}}]}